The pattern of HPV distribution in this population was different from that in other regions in the world, which has important consequences for HPV vaccine development.
Prediction of recurrent disease by cytology and HPV testing after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaObjective: To assess the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and cytology as predictors of residual ⁄ recurrent disease after treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions. Methods: One hundred and thirty-eight women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 ⁄ 3 lesion on biopsy were included in a prospective follow-up study in Belgium and Nicaragua. All women were treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and follow-up visits took place at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. During these visits, a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear test was taken, colposcopy was performed and specimens were collected for HPV testing. Cytology, high-risk (HR) HPV presence, persistent HR HPV infection and combinations of these tests at different time points during follow-up were correlated with histologically confirmed residual ⁄ recurrent disease. Results: Thirteen patients (9%) developed residual ⁄ recurrent disease during follow-up. Abnormal cytology at 6 weeks after treatment was significantly correlated with residual ⁄ recurrent disease. Nine of thirty-seven patients with abnormal cytology at 6 weeks had recurrent disease versus three of seventy with a normal cytology [odds ratio (OR): 7.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8-28.5; P = 0.003). Sensitivity of this test was 75.0%, specificity 70.5%. Combining abnormal cytology and the presence of HR HPV within the first 6 months after treatment gave the best correlation with residual ⁄ recurrent disease: of the 54 women with abnormal cytology and ⁄ or HR HPV presence within the first 6 months, 11 developed residual ⁄ recurrent disease (OR 10.2; 95% CI: 2.2-48.3). Sensitivity of this combination was 84.6% and specificity 65.0%. Conclusion: Cytology remains the cornerstone in the early follow-up after LEEP for CIN lesions of the cervix. HPV testing can add value as it increases the sensitivity of cytology in concomitant testing within the first 6 months.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a serious problem after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To investigate the incidence of CMV infection and outcome we retrospectively analyzed 70 consecutive pediatric allogeneic HSCTs monitored by CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with at least 1-year follow-up or until death. All patients at risk for CMV infection (CMV-seropositive patients and CMV-seronegative recipients transplanted from CMV-seropositive donors) received hyperimmune anti-CMV globulins whereas in the group of HSCT patients with both donor and recipient CMV negativity, polyvalent immunoglobulins were given, both at a dose of 400 mg/kg. All patients received acyclovir at prophylactic doses for at least 6 months. Patients were monitored twice a week by CMV PCR. Patients with 2 positive results for CMV DNAemia received ganciclovir for 14 days and continued until 2 consecutive negative results were obtained. The incidence of CMV DNAemia was 12.8% (9/70) in the whole group, with significant higher risk for patients with CMV-seropositive recipient status, 8 out of 22 (36%), vs. patients with seronegative status, 1 out of 48 (2%) (P=0.0002). Three out of 9 patients with DNAemia developed CMV disease despite adequate preemptive treatment. The transplant-related mortality was higher in the CMV-seropositive recipient group (P=0.05). Age, use of hyperimmune anti-CMV globulins at a high dose, and the low incidence of graft-versus-host disease might be contributing factors to this low incidence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.