Soft thermotropic liquid crystals (TLCs) have advantages on processability and shape memory compared to hard solids and fluids. The development of photoswitchable soft TLCs based on biomolecules would afford reworkable shape information recording biomaterials for the areas requiring biocompatibility and degradability. In recent years, anhydrous DNA TLCs composed of DNA and ammonium surfactants have been receiving continuous attention. However, the photoswitchable phase transition has not been realized for soft DNA TLCs at room temperature, owing to the absence of functional ammonium surfactant. Herein, a new type of azobenzene-containing surfactant would be applied to the fabrication of soft DNA TLCs with photoresponsive physical properties. The double-chain design of the used surfactant and the use of DOAB as a dopant guarantee the soft state of DNA TLCs at r.t., which also facilitates the azobenzene isomerization by reducing the packing density of surfactants. With the assistance of photoisomerization of azobenzene, the reported DNA TLCs achieve reversible liquid crystal-isotropic liquid transition at temperatures below clearing points even at room temperature. The repeatable shape information recording and self-erasing tests indicate these DNA TLCs would be good shape information recording biomaterials in the future. This work also provides a useful strategy for designing photoresponsive soft biomaterials based on rigid biomolecules like DNA.

Thermoplastic vulcanisates (TPVs) based on ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA)/styrenebutadiene rubber (SBR) blends were prepared by dynamic vulcanisation, with the TPVs being reinforced by carbon black (CB). Experimental results indicated that the mechanical properties of dynamically vulcanised EVA/SBR blends were enhanced remarkably by the incorporation of CB. Morphology study showed that the SBR particles with average diameter of 20 μm were dispersed evenly on the etched surface of EVA/SBR/CB TPVs. The Mullins effect could be observed in the stress-strain curves of EVA/SBR TPVs and EVA/SBR/CB TPVs during the uniaxial loading-unloading cycles. Compared with EVA/SBR TPVs, CB reinforced EVA/SBR TPVs had the relatively higher stress, residual deformation and internal friction loss.