Oncostatin M (OSM), a member of the gp130 cytokine family, is involved in T H 2 inflammation, epidermal integrity, and fibrosis. The effect of OSM on MCP-1 was evaluated with and without interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, and anti-OSM receptor b (OSMRb) monoclonal antibody, KPL-716, in human epidermal keratinocytes (HEK) and human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) in vitro. Cells were stimulated with OSM, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), IL-31, IL-13, alone or in combination, and separately with OSM, OSM+IL-4, and increasing concentrations of KPL-716. MCP-1 levels in supernatants were determined by ELISA. MCP-1 and receptor chain mRNAs were measured (Nanostring). OSM (50 ng/mL) strongly induced MCP-1 protein (P<.05 in HEK or HDF) and mRNA (P<.001 in HEK or HDF) at 24 hrs. In HEK, OSM (but not LIF or IL-31) induced phosphorylation of STAT3 or STAT1 and synergized with either IL-13 or IL-4 in elevating MCP-1 (P<.01). Results were similar for OSM in HDF; LIF or IL-31 minimally activated STAT3 but not MCP-1. A dose-dependent increase in MCP-1 production was observed for IL-4 or IL-13 in combination with OSM (P<.01) but not with LIF or IL-31. OSM significantly stimulated mRNA for the receptor chains of type II IL-4 receptor (HEK, P<.05; HDF, P<.01) and type II OSM receptor (HEK, P<.05; HDF, P<.01), but not for chains of LIF receptor or IL-31RA. KPL-716 significantly attenuated the cellular MCP-1 response to OSM (P<.0001) and the synergistic response to OSM+IL-4 (at 5 and 20 ng/mL; P<.0001) in HEK.Anti-IL-31 receptor a or isotype control antibody had no significant effect on the OSMe and OSM+IL-4-induced responses. These data show that OSM synergizes with IL-4/13, and that LIF or IL-31 do not in this system. Potent inhibition of OSM activity suggests therapeutic potential of KPL-716 in T H 2-mediated diseases distinct from KPL-716 inhibition of IL-31.
Background: We are currently screening human volunteers to determine their sputum polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) response 6 and 24 hours following initiation of exposure to wood smoke particles (WSP). Inflammatory responders (>10% increase in %PMN) are identified for their subsequent participation in mitigation studies against WSP-induced airways inflammation. In this report we compared responder status (N=52) at both 6 and 24hr time points to refine/expand its classification, assessed the impact of the GSTM1 genotype, asthma status and sex on responder status, and explored whether sputum soluble phase markers of inflammation correlate with PMN responsiveness to WSP. Results: In the entire cohort, we found a significant, but very small, decrease in FVC and systolic blood pressure immediately following WSP exposure and sputum %PMNs were significantly increased at 24 hours post exposure, the latter finding was also significantly correlated with sputum IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, and PMN/mg; a similar response was not found at the 6 hour %PMN response. Blood endpoints in the entire cohort showed a significant increase in %PMN and PMN/mg at 6 but not 24 hours. Six-hour responders tended to be 24-hour responders and vice versa, but 24-hour responders also had significantly increased IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8 at 24 hours post WSP exposure. The GSTM1 null genotype significantly (p<0.05) enhanced the %PMN response at 6 hours in the entire cohort, by 24% in the 24-hour responders and not at all in the 6 hours responders. Asthma status enhanced the 24 hour %PMN response in the entire cohort and in the 6- and 24-hour responders. Sex had no effect on %PMN response. Conclusions: The 24 hour time point was more informative than the 6 hour time point in optimally defining airway inflammatory responsiveness to WSP exposure. GSTM1 and asthma status are significant effect modifiers of this response. These study design and subject parameters should be considered before enrolling volunteers for proof-of-concept WSP mitigation studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.