Background The development program (UNIFI) has shown promising results of ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment that should be confirmed in clinical practice. Aims Primary: to evaluate the durability of ustekinumab treatment in UC patients in clinical practice. Secondary: to assess the short-term response (at week 16) and the long-term effectiveness (at maximum follow-up) and to assess the safety of ustekinumab in clinical practice. Methods Patients included in the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry who received at least one intravenous dose of ustekinumab due to active UC [Partial Mayo Score (PMS) >2] were included. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on PMS. Results 95 patients were included (table 1). At week 16, 53% of patients had clinical response (including 35% of patients in remission) (figure 1). In the multivariate analysis, elevated serum C-reactive protein was the only variable significantly associated with clinical remission. Long-term remission is represented in figure 2. 36% of patients discontinued the treatment with ustekinumab during a median follow-up of 31 weeks. The probability of maintaining ustekinumab treatment was 87% at week 16, 63% at week 56, and 59% at week 72 (figure 3); primary failure was the main reason for ustekinumab discontinuation. No variable was associated with risk of discontinuation. Three patients reported adverse events; one of them had a fatal severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion Ustekinumab is effective both in the short and the long-term in real-life, even in a highly refractory cohort. Higher inflammatory burden at baseline correlated with lower probability of achieving remission. Safety was consistent with the known profile of ustekinumab.

Background Intravenous (IV) infliximab is a first line treatment for moderate or severe flare of inflammatory bowel disease. Recently a new formulation of infliximab with subcutaneous (SC) administration has been developed and approved for this indication. Methods From March 2021, 14 patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease-CD- or ucerative colitis-UC), in clinical remission for at least 6 months with infliximab IV who had needed previous intensification, either because of a reactive therapeutic drug monitoring and loss of response, or because of a proactive drug monitoring (trough levels <3µg/ml), were switched to SC infliximab. We analized retrospectively from the start of SC infliximab until week 8 after switch, fecal calprotectin levels (FC), C reactive protein (CRP), concomitant treatment, trough levels, treatment adherence, need for intensification or relapse, and adverse events. Results Four patients (28,57%) were diagnosed with CD, 10(71,4%) were diagnosed with UC (Table 1). Median duration of IV treatment was 53 months (IQR 33–59). Reasons for starting infliximab were corticodependence in 6 patients (42,8%), corticorefractoriness in 6(42,8%) and topdown strategy in B2 phenotipe with Crohn’s disease in 2 (14,3%). Reasons for intensification were: loss of response in 5 patients (35,7%), intensified induction in one (7,1%), proactive therapeutic drug monitoring in 8 (57,14%) (graphic 1). Intensification regimens are shown in graphic 2. Eleven patients (78,57%) were still in an intensified regimen when switched. All patients were in clinical and biochemical remission (FC<200 µg/g and CRP<10 mg/dl) before switch. Median basal infliximab trough levels before switch were 6,98µg/ml (IQR 2,4-10,5); median trough levels 8 weeks after switch were 14,12 (IQR 12,22-22,7) (p=0,003) (graphic 3). Thirteen patients (92,8%) followed treatment and stayed in clinical remission. One patient, treated with original IV infliximab before switch, relapsed after third subcutaneous administration, and did not respond to reintroduction of original IV infliximab. There were no adverse events. Conclusion In our centre, switching from IV to standard dose SC infliximab maintained clinical and biochemical remission in patients that previously needed intensified regimen, improving trough levels without any adverse events. These findings provide potential therapeutic insights into SC infliximab as a monotherapy agent for inflammatory bowel disease.

Background The efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) refractory to anti-TNF is worse than in anti-TNF naïve patients. Methods Retrospective study of patients with CD refractory or intolerant to TNF initiating ustekinumab between January 2013 and March 2020, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, and without corticosteroid treatment. Our aim was evaluated clinical response (reduction of CDAI >100), clinical remission (CDAI <150) and biochemical remission (CDAI <100 and CRP <1 mg/L and faecal calprotectin <100 µg/g) in short and long term. Results A total of 49 patients with a medium follow-up of 28 months (IQR:13-37) were included. Patients baseline characteristics are reflected in Table 1. In 20% patients the induction was made subcutaneous (90 mg/week for 4 weeks). At week 52, clinical response, clinical remission and biochemical remission was 93%, 82% and 54% respectively (Figure 1). In the long term (3 years), 62% had clinical response, 52% remained in clinical remission, and 48% showed biochemical remission. 1/3 of patients needed intensification every year. Ustekinumab treatment discontinuation was observed in 13 patients (27%) mainly due to lack of response (6[12%]: primary, 7[14%]: secondary). No serious adverse effects have been reported. Conclusion About 50% of the patients are in clinical and biochemical remission at week 152 in a real-life cohort of anti-TNF-exposed CD patients. With a harder remission definition including biochemical parameters, our results in real life are similar to pivotal studies at week 152. Nevertheless, at week 52 our remission rates were higher.

No abstract

No abstract