Aim: To evaluate the functional outcome of bipolar hemiarthroplasty in intracapsular fracture neck of femur. Study design: Descriptive cross sectional study. Place and duration of study: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Peoples Medical University Hospital, Shaheed Benazir Abad from 1st December 2017 to 31st December 2020. Methodology: Sixty six cases of intracapsular femoral neck fractures with age ranging from 50 year to 75 year of either gender who were ambulatory before injury were included; while basicervical, younger than 50 years, with neuromuscular disorder, unfit for surgery, open fracture, bilateral injuries, osteoarthritis of hip, Rheumatoid, Gouty, pathological fractures, bedridden & who did not give consent for study, were excluded from the study. Functional outcome assessed by Harris hip score & data analyzed by SPSS version 23. Results: Twenty six (59.09%) were male and 40 (40.91%) were female with mean age of 64.3±7.77 year. Average time from injury to hospital arrival was 14.7±6.8 hours. Average time from hospitalization to surgery was 4.67±2.23 days. Average time of surgery was 55.67±9.9 minutes. Average hospital stay was 9.7±4.3 days. The average time of follow-up was 18.45±7.63 months. Conclusion: Bipolar implant is safe, effective, reliable, stable and cost effective implant for intracpsular fracture of femoral neck in elderly populace. The 66.66% of patients have satisfactory Harris hip score in follow up duration of 18.45±7.63 months. Keywords: Functional, Outcome, Femoral neck fractures, FNF, Bipolar, Hemiarthroplasty, HHS

Objective: Our study was designed to evaluate the effect of dynamisation in delayed union tibia shaft fractures. Methodology: This prospective study was conducted at the Orthopedic Department, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College, from March 2020 to March 2021. During this timeframe total of 20 patients who underwent dynamisation for reamed intramedullary nailing were recruited. After two successive visits, those patients whose fracture failed to show progressive signs of callus formation underwent dynamisation. We removed the single static screw from the longer fracture segment to perform the dynamisation procedure. We inserted a poller screw slightly medial to the nail from anterior to posterior to provide additional stability to the proximal fragment. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS 23.0. For evaluating the success of dynamisation Chi-square test was used. Results: The mean age of recruited patients was reported as 35.92 years ranging from 16 years to 63 years old. Out of these twenty cases, 17 were male (85%). The mean time duration of nailing was reported as 35.4 hours. Total fourteen patients were immediately treated with nailing within 20 hours of injury, while the rest six underwent delayed nailing. Total four cases of tibial fracture were turned out as failure because the patient failed to achieve union after dynamisation and underwent augmentation plating with bone grafting for the complete union. Conclusion: Delayed dynamisation is a convenient and cost-effective technique to achieve union in femoral shaft fractures. Overall, our study reported an 80% success rate but failed to achieve early dynamisation in comminuted fractures.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of Chlorhexidine in the prevention of pin tract infection as compared to Povidone-iodine antiseptic. Study Design: Prospective, single blinded randomized trial. Study Setting and Duration: Liaquat University of Health Science (LUMHS), Jamshoro between July 2018 to November 2020. Methodology: All patients who underwent Ilizarov external fixation as per indications were eligible for the study. Individuals with a previous history of osteomyelitis were excluded from the study. Pin sites were cleansed with normal saline using clean applicators. In the group chlorhexidine, the antiseptic was applied on the pin skin interphases (1% chlorhexidine). Similarly, 10% povidone iodine was applied to patients in group C. The control group was cleansed with normal saline. Pin sites were either dressed daily or weekly. The primary outcome was the rate of pin site infection days. Results: Chlorhexidine group had significantly lesser pin-site infections as compared to the povidone-iodine group with a frequency of 13 (39.39%) and 19 (63.33%), p=0.04, respectively. The mean pin tract infection rate days ± SD were significantly lower in the chlorhexidine group as compared to the povidone-iodine group (1.35 ± 2.26 vs 3.54 ± 4.30, p=0.041). Similarly, the mean duration to onset of pin site infection was also significantly higher in the chlorhexidine group compared to povidone-iodine and control groups. Conclusion: Patients who used Chlorhexidine as the cleansing agent had significantly fewer pin-site infections as compared to the povidone-iodine group. Keywords: Chlorhexidine, Ilizarov fixator, fracture, Povidone-iodine

Introduction: One of the major public health concerns across the world is the fractures occurring at the distal end of radius with an incidence rate of 25.4 per 10000 elderly people who are of about 65 years of age. These fractures are the most common fractures occurring in the upper extremities of elderly patients. More than 210 million dollars are regularly spent on the management of radial fractures of the distal ends which are expected to increase every year, however, the process of managing radial distal fractures is still controversial. Aim: To compare the outcomes of surgical and non-surgical management of distal radial fractures in elderly patients. Methodology: The current study involved 90 patients who were more than 65 years of age and were treated either surgically or non-surgically. Patients who were treated non-surgically were treated with cast immobilization whereas patients who underwent surgery had either plate or external fixation. Functional scores and baseline radiographs were recorded before treatment, and follow-up was conducted at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. Radiographic and clinical follow-ups were observed along functional scores were calculated and observed. Results: Patients who were treated without surgery had a mean age of 76 years, whereas 44 patients who were treated with surgery had a mean age of 73 years. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of other demographic factors. No differences in the functional status were observed in terms of arms, hands, and shoulders whereas pain scores also exhibited no significant differences. Conclusion: It is suggested that minor limitations exist between wrist motion range and grip strength which was diminished with the non-operative care, but functional recovery was not limited during 12 months follow-up.

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of corticosteroids therapy and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Study design: A longitudinal study Place and Duration: This study was conducted at Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences Jamshoro Pakistan from June 2020 to June 2021 Methodology: A total of 120 participants were considered in the study. Participants were divided into two groups. Both groups consisted of 60 patients each. One group was treated with corticosteroids injection (n=60) and the other was treated with PRP (n=60). All the participants were assessed clinically at the time of induction of treatment, after six weeks of the treatment, and after six months of the treatment. The clinical assessment included the visual analog pain scale (VAS), Roles and Maudsley scoring, and the American Foot & Ankle Society (FAS). Results: A significant improvement in plantar fascia thickness, VAS, and AFAS was observed after the injection was given to the participants of both groups. The mean AFAS of the PRP group at 6th week was 84.6±4.8 and in the sixth month, it was 90.4±2.9. The value of AFAS of the corticosteroid group at 6th week was 75.3±4.7 and it was 80.1±4.2 in the sixth month. The mean value of VAS in the PRP group at the 6th week was 2.5±1 and at the 6th month was 1±0.7. Likewise, the value of VAS in the corticosteroid group at 6th week was 4±1.2 and at 6th week was 2.7±0.8. There were no complications in both groups. Conclusion: The corticosteroids injection and PRP injection have the same effectivity for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Keywords: Plantar Fasciitis, PRP, Corticosteroids