Background:18 F-FDG PET/CT has been added as a major criterion in the ESC 2015 infective endocarditis guidelines, but the benefit of the ESC criteria has not been prospectively compared with the conventional Duke criteria
Objectives:1. Primary objective: To assess the value of the ESC criteria including 18 F-FDG-PET/CT in prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (PVE). 2. Secondary objectives i: to assess the reproducibility of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT, ii: to compare its diagnostic value with that of echocardiography, and iii: to assess the diagnostic value of the presence of a diffuse splenic uptake
Methods :Between 2014 and 2017, 175 patients with suspected PVE were prospectively included in 3 French centers. After exclusion of patients with uninterpretable 18 F-FDG PET/CT, 115 patients were evaluated, including 91 definite and 24 rejected IE, as defined by an expert Consensus.
Results :Cardiac uptake by 18 F-FDG PET/CT was observed in 67/91 patients with definite PVE and 6 with rejected IE (sensitivity 73.6% 95%CI: 63.3 to 82.3%, specificity 75% 53.3% to 90.2%). The ESC 2015 classification increased the sensitivity of Duke criteria from 57.1% 46.3 to 67.5% to 83.5% 74.3% to 90.5%, (p< 0.001) but decreased its specificity from 95.8% 78.9% to 99.9% to 70.8% 48.9% to 87.4%. Intraobserver reproducibility of 18 F-FDG PET/CT was good (kappa= 0.84) but inter observer reproducibility was less satisfactory (kappa= 0.63). A diffuse splenic uptake was observed in 24 (20.3%) patients, including 23 (25.3%) of definite PVE, and only 1 (4.2%) rejected PVE (p=0.024).
Conclusion :18 F-FDG PET/CT is a useful diagnostic tool in suspected PVE, and explains the greater sensitivity of ESC criteria compared to Duke criteria. However, 18 F-FDG PET/CT also presents important limitations concerning its feasibility, specificity and reproducibility. Our study describes for the first time a new endocarditis criterion, i.e. the presence of a diffuse splenic uptake on 18 F-FDG PET/CT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.