Summary Background Increasing evidence implicates both platelets and neutrophils in the formation, stabilization, and growth of peripheral and coronary thrombi. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) play a key role. The early events in the deregulated cross‐talk between platelets and neutrophils are poorly characterized. Objectives To identify at the molecular level the mechanism through which platelets induce the generation of NETs in sterile conditions. Patients/Methods The presence of NETs was determined in 26 thrombi from patients with acute myocardial infarction by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence and markers of NETs assessed in the plasma. In vitro NET generation was studied in static and in physiological flow conditions. Results Coronary thrombi mainly consist of activated platelets, neutrophils, and NETs in close proximity of platelets. Activated platelets commit neutrophils to NET generation. The event abates in the presence of competitive antagonists of the high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein. Hmgb1−/− platelets fail to elicit NETs, whereas the HMGB1 alone commits neutrophils to NET generation. Integrity of the HMGB1 receptor, Receptor for Advanced Glycation End products (RAGE), is required for NET formation, as assessed using pharmacologic and genetic tools. Exposure to HMGB1 prevents depletion of mitochondrial potential, induces autophagosome formation, and prolongs neutrophil survival. These metabolic effects are caused by the activation of autophagy. Blockade of the autophagic flux reverts platelet HMGB1‐elicited NET generation. Conclusions Activated platelets present HMGB1 to neutrophils and commit them to autophagy and NET generation. This chain of events may be responsible for some types of thromboinflammatory lesions and indicates novel paths for molecular intervention.

The online version of this article has a Supplementary Appendix. BackgroundMacrophages play a key role in iron homeostasis. In peripheral tissues, they are known to polarize into classically activated (or M1) macrophages and alternatively activated (or M2) macrophages. Little is known on whether the polarization program influences the ability of macrophages to store or recycle iron and the molecular machinery involved in the processes. Design and MethodsInflammatory/M1 and alternatively activated/M2 macrophages were propagated in vitro from mouse bone-marrow precursors and polarized in the presence of recombinant interferon-γ or interleukin-4. We characterized and compared their ability to handle radioactive iron, the characteristics of the intracellular iron pools and the expression of molecules involved in internalization, storage and export of the metal. Moreover we verified the influence of iron on the relative ability of polarized macrophages to activate antigen-specific T cells. ResultsM1 macrophages have low iron regulatory protein 1 and 2 binding activity, express high levels of ferritin H, low levels of transferrin receptor 1 and internalize -albeit with low efficiencyiron only when its extracellular concentration is high. In contrast, M2 macrophages have high iron regulatory protein binding activity, express low levels of ferritin H and high levels of transferrin receptor 1. M2 macrophages have a larger intracellular labile iron pool, effectively take up and spontaneously release iron at low concentrations and have limited storage ability. Iron export correlates with the expression of ferroportin, which is higher in M2 macrophages. M1 and M2 cells activate antigen-specific, MHC class II-restricted T cells. In the absence of the metal, only M1 macrophages are effective. ConclusionsCytokines that drive macrophage polarization ultimately control iron handling, leading to the differentiation of macrophages into a subset which has a relatively sealed intracellular iron content (M1) or into a subset endowed with the ability to recycle the metal (M2).Key words: macrophages, iron, inflammation. 95(11):1814-1822 doi:10.3324/haematol.2010 This is an open-access paper. Polarization dictates iron handling by inflammatory and alternatively activated macrophages. Haematologica Polarization dictates iron handling by inflammatory and alternatively activated macrophages

No abstract

Cellular senescence is a mechanism that provides an irreversible barrier to cell cycle progression to prevent undesired proliferation. However, under pathological circumstances, senescence can adversely affect organ function, viability and regeneration. We have developed a mouse model of biliary senescence, based on the conditional deletion of Mdm2 in bile ducts under the control of the Krt19 promoter, that exhibits features of biliary disease. Here we report that senescent cholangiocytes induce profound alterations in the cellular and signalling microenvironment, with recruitment of myofibroblasts and macrophages causing collagen deposition, TGFβ production and induction of senescence in surrounding cholangiocytes and hepatocytes. Finally, we study how inhibition of TGFβ-signalling disrupts the transmission of senescence and restores liver function. We identify cellular senescence as a detrimental mechanism in the development of biliary injury. Our results identify TGFβ as a potential therapeutic target to limit senescence-dependent aggravation in human cholangiopathies.