Summary The temperature response of photosynthesis is one of the key factors determining predicted responses to warming in global vegetation models (GVMs). The response may vary geographically, owing to genetic adaptation to climate, and temporally, as a result of acclimation to changes in ambient temperature. Our goal was to develop a robust quantitative global model representing acclimation and adaptation of photosynthetic temperature responses. We quantified and modelled key mechanisms responsible for photosynthetic temperature acclimation and adaptation using a global dataset of photosynthetic CO2 response curves, including data from 141 C3 species from tropical rainforest to Arctic tundra. We separated temperature acclimation and adaptation processes by considering seasonal and common‐garden datasets, respectively. The observed global variation in the temperature optimum of photosynthesis was primarily explained by biochemical limitations to photosynthesis, rather than stomatal conductance or respiration. We found acclimation to growth temperature to be a stronger driver of this variation than adaptation to temperature at climate of origin. We developed a summary model to represent photosynthetic temperature responses and showed that it predicted the observed global variation in optimal temperatures with high accuracy. This novel algorithm should enable improved prediction of the function of global ecosystems in a warming climate.
Earth system models (ESMs) use photosynthetic capacity, indexed by the maximum Rubisco carboxylation rate (V cmax), to simulate carbon assimilation and typically rely on empirical estimates, including an assumed dependence on leaf nitrogen determined from soil fertility. In contrast, new theory, based on biochemical coordination and co‐optimization of carboxylation and water costs for photosynthesis, suggests that optimal V cmax can be predicted from climate alone, irrespective of soil fertility. Here, we develop this theory and find it captures 64% of observed variability in a global, field‐measured V cmax dataset for C3 plants. Soil fertility indices explained substantially less variation (32%). These results indicate that environmentally regulated biophysical constraints and light availability are the first‐order drivers of global photosynthetic capacity. Through acclimation and adaptation, plants efficiently utilize resources at the leaf level, thus maximizing potential resource use for growth and reproduction. Our theory offers a robust strategy for dynamically predicting photosynthetic capacity in ESMs.
Key words: A-C i curve, leaf respiration during the day (R day ), maximum carboxylation rate (V cmax ), net photosynthetic rate at saturating irradiance and at ambient atmospheric CO 2 concentration (A sat ). SummarySimulations of photosynthesis by terrestrial biosphere models typically need a specification of the maximum carboxylation rate (V cmax ). Estimating this parameter using A-C i curves (net photosynthesis, A, vs intercellular CO 2 concentration, C i ) is laborious, which limits availability of V cmax data. However, many multispecies field datasets include net photosynthetic rate at saturating irradiance and at ambient atmospheric CO 2 concentration (A sat ) measurements, from which V cmax can be extracted using a 'one-point method'.We used a global dataset of A-C i curves (564 species from 46 field sites, covering a range of plant functional types) to test the validity of an alternative approach to estimate V cmax from A sat via this 'one-point method'.If leaf respiration during the day (R day ) is known exactly, V cmax can be estimated with an r 2 value of 0.98 and a root-mean-squared error (RMSE) of 8.19 lmol m À2 s À1 . However, R day typically must be estimated. Estimating R day as 1.5% of V cmax, we found that V cmax could be estimated with an r 2 of 0.95 and an RMSE of 17.1 lmol m À2 s À1 . The one-point method provides a robust means to expand current databases of fieldmeasured V cmax , giving new potential to improve vegetation models and quantify the environmental drivers of V cmax variation.
Mesophyll conductance ( g m ) is a critical variable for the use of stable carbon isotopes to infer photosynthetic water-use efficiency (WUE). Although g m is similar in magnitude to stomatal conductance ( g s ), it has been measured less often, especially under field conditions and at high temporal resolution. We mounted an isotopic CO 2 analyser on a field photosynthetic gas exchange system to make continuous online measurements of gas exchange and photosynthetic 13 C discrimination (Δ 13 C) on mature Pinus sylvestris trees. This allowed the calculation of g m , g s , net photosynthesis ( A net ), and WUE. These measurements highlighted the asynchronous diurnal behaviour of g m and g s . While g s declined from around 10:00, A net declined first after 12:00, and g m remained near its maximum until 16:00. We suggest that high g m played a role in supporting an extended A net peak despite stomatal closure. Comparing three models to estimate WUE from ∆ 13 C, we found that a simple model, assuming constant net fractionation during carboxylation (27‰), predicted WUE well, but only for about 75% of the day. A more comprehensive model, accounting explicitly for g m and the effects of daytime respiration and photorespiration, gave reliable estimates of WUE, even in the early morning hours when WUE was more variable. Considering constant, finite g m or g m / g s yielded similar WUE estimates on the diurnal scale, while assuming infinite g m led to overestimation of WUE. These results highlight the potential of high-resolution g m measurements to improve modelling of A net and WUE and demonstrate that such g m data can be acquired, even under field conditions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11120-019-00645-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.