Drug-induced nephrotoxicity is a major concern, since many pharmacological compounds are filtered through the kidneys for excretion into urine. To discover biochemical biomarkers useful for early identification of nephrotoxicity, metabolomic experiments were performed on Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD (SD) rats treated with the nephrotoxins gentamicin, cisplatin, or tobramycin. Using a combination of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), a global, nontargeted metabolomics analysis was performed on urine and kidney samples collected after one, five, and twenty-eight dosing days. Increases in polyamines and amino acids were observed in urine from drug-treated rats after a single dose, and prior to observable histological kidney damage and conventional clinical chemistry indications of nephrotoxicity. Thus, these metabolites are potential biomarkers for the early detection of drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Upon prolonged dosing, nephrotoxin-induced changes included a progressive loss of amino acids in urine, concomitant with a decrease in amino acids and nucleosides in kidney tissue. A nephrotoxicity prediction model, based on the levels of branched-chain amino acids in urine, distinguished nephrotoxin-treated samples from vehicle-control samples, with 100%, 93%, and 70% accuracy at day 28, day 5, and day 1, respectively. Thus, this panel of biomarkers may provide a noninvasive method to detect kidney injury long before the onset of histopathological kidney damage.
Objective: Balneotherapy, a domain of medical science, focuses on
utilizing the beneficial effects of medicinal waters. Low back pain is
among the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorders affecting a
large proportion of the population during their lifetime. Although
small in number, all controlled studies published on this subject
have demonstrated the benefits of balneotherapy. This present
study was undertaken to compare the effects of hydrotherapy with
mineral water vs. tap water on low back pain. Patients and Methods:
A single-blind clinical study was carried out to appraise the
therapeutic efficacy of reduced sulphurous water on 60 patients
with low back pain. 30 subjects took baths in reduced sulphurous
mineral water, whereas the other 30 patients used modified tap
water of matching odor. Parameters determined at baseline, after
balneo-/hydrotherapy, and at the end of the 3-month follow-up period
included the results of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score,
the modified Oswestry index, mobility of the spine, antalgic posture,
tenderness of the paravertebral muscles on palpation, the dose
requirements for analgesics, and the efficacy assessed by the investigators
and by the patients. Results: Bathing in mineral water
resulted in a statistically significant improvement. This was reflected
by the VAS (p < 0.01) and manifested by the mitigation of muscle
spasm (p < 0.01), the alleviation of local tenderness (p < 0.01),
the enhanced flexion-extension and rotation of the spine (p < 0.01)
as well as by the improvement of the Schober’s index (p < 0.01). All
these beneficial changes persisted as long as 3 months after the
completion of balneotherapy. By contrast, hydrotherapy with tap
water resulted only in the temporary improvement of just a single
parameter: the VAS score improved significantly (p < 0.01). Conclusions:
Balneotherapy in itself can alleviate low back pain. As demonstrated
by this study, the analgesic efficacy and improvement
of mobility accomplished by the use of mineral water is significantly
superior to that afforded by hydrotherapy with tap water. Our results
clearly establish the beneficial effects of mineral water. Moreover,
it is a valuable adjunct to other forms of physical treatment as
well as to pharmacotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.