The article addresses some new ways of thinking about generativity as a construct, which may be useful in understanding the cultural personhood of older Americans.

Although the majority undertook active steps to prepare for future care needs, many missed key steps or achievement of planning goals recommended by experts. Findings may be applied to long-term care planning research by providing added, rich detail on how aging women construct their options, make choices, and address this important area for future well-being.

Hardship and illness in participants' lives frame their diabetes experience and notions of well-being. Providers need to be aware of the social, economic, and political lenses shaping diabetes self-management and subjective well-being.

Healthcare providers (HCP) understand the importance of keeping patients motivated but may be unaware how their words may have unintended negative effects upon their patient’s lives. People with diabetes report being told by their HCP that they are “cured” or that they are praised for strides made in weight-loss and/or lowered blood glucose, and interpret these messages in unexpected ways. For this paper, we focus upon one case to illustrate the depth and nuance of the patient-provider communication as it emerged within a larger interview-based ethnographic study. Audio-recorded interviews and transcriptions were analyzed discursively. Discourse analysis reveals the ways ideology affects how the patient responds to HCP’s utterances and how this affects diabetes self-care. Findings indicate significant perlocutionary effects upon health outcomes, varying both positively and/or negatively. This study points to the importance of carefully considering the power of words and whenever possible knowing the patient’s ideological orientation to their world. HCPs should be explicit and deliberate with their communication. Sensitization to the various ways patients hear and react to messages in a clinical setting may lead to improved health outcomes, especially for those with chronic health conditions such as diabetes mellitus.

Background Because use of a study partner (proxy decision-maker) to give informed consent on behalf of someone living with Alzheimer’s disease or related dementias (ADRD) is common in nearly all clinical research, people living with ADRD who lack a study partner are regularly excluded from participation. Social research presents different opportunities and risks than clinical research. We argue that guidelines developed for the latter may be unduly restrictive for social research and, further, that the automatic exclusion of people living with ADRD presents separate ethical challenges by failing to support extant decision-making capacity and by contributing to underrepresentation in research. Purpose The study objective was to identify key components related to including cognitively vulnerable participants who lack a study partner in social research. Research design/Study sample We conducted an adaptive qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) and subsequent content analysis on 49 articles addressing capacity and research consent for potentially cognitively compromised individuals, to include people living with ADRD, who lack a study partner. Results We identified four major topic areas: defining competency, capacity, and consent; aspects of informed consent; strategies to assess comprehension of risks associated with social research; and risks versus benefits. Conclusions Based on findings, we suggest new and ethically appropriate ways to determine capacity to consent to social research, make consent processes accessible to a population experiencing cognitive challenges, and consider the risks of excluding a growing population from research that could benefit millions.