The standard nomenclature that has been used for many telencephalic and related brainstem structures in birds is based on flawed assumptions of homology to mammals. In particular, the outdated terminology implies that most of the avian telencephalon is a hypertrophied basal ganglia, when it is now clear that most of the avian telencephalon is neurochemically, hodologically, and functionally comparable to the mammalian neocortex, claustrum, and pallial amygdala (all of which derive from the pallial sector of the developing telencephalon). Recognizing that this promotes misunderstanding of the functional organization of avian brains and their evolutionary relationship to mammalian brains, avian brain specialists began discussions to rectify this problem, culminating in the Avian Brain Nomenclature Forum held at Duke University in July 2002, which approved a new terminology for avian telencephalon and some allied brainstem cell groups. Details of this new terminology are presented here, as is a rationale for each name change and evidence for any homologies implied by the new names.Revisions for the brainstem focused on vocal control, catecholaminergic, cholinergic, and basal ganglia-related nuclei. For example, the Forum recognized that the hypoglossal nucleus had been incorrectly identified as the nucleus intermedius in the Karten and Hodos (1967) pigeon brain atlas, and what was identified as the hypoglossal nucleus in that atlas should instead be called the supraspinal nucleus. The locus ceruleus of this and other avian atlases was noted to consist of a caudal noradrenergic part homologous to the mammalian locus coeruleus and a rostral region corresponding to the mammalian A8 dopaminergic cell group. The midbrain dopaminergic cell group in birds known as the nucleus tegmenti pedunculopontinus pars compacta was recognized as homologous to the mammalian substantia nigra pars compacta and was renamed accordingly; a group of ␥-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic neurons at the lateral edge of this region was identified as homologous to the mammalian substantia nigra pars reticulata and was also renamed accordingly. A field of cholinergic neurons in the rostral avian hindbrain was named the nucleus pedunculopontinus tegmenti, whereas the anterior nucleus of the ansa lenticularis in the avian diencephalon was renamed the subthalamic nucleus, both for their evident mammalian homologues.For the basal (i.e., subpallial) telencephalon, the actual parts of the basal ganglia were given names reflecting their now evident homologues. For example, the lobus parolfactorius and paleostriatum augmentatum were acknowledged to make up the dorsal subdivision of the striatal part of the basal ganglia and were renamed as the medial and lateral striatum. The paleostriatum primitivum was recognized as homologous to the mammalian globus pallidus and renamed as such. Additionally, the rostroventral part of what was called the lobus parolfactorius was acknowledged as comparable to the mammalian nucleus accumbens, which, together with the...

We believe that names have a powerful influence on the experiments we do and the way in which we think. For this reason, and in the light of new evidence about the function and evolution of the vertebrate brain, an international consortium of neuroscientists has reconsidered the traditional, 100-year-old terminology that is used to describe the avian cerebrum. Our current understanding of the avian brain -in particular the neocortex-like cognitive functions of the avian pallium -requires a new terminology that better reflects these functions and the homologies between avian and mammalian brains.One hundred years ago, Edinger, the father of comparative neuroanatomy, formulated a unified theory of brain evolution that formed the basis of a nomenclature that has been used to define the cerebral subdivisions of all vertebrates 1 . This resulted in terms and associated concepts such as palaeostriatum, archistriatum, neostriatum and neocortex that are still in common use. According to this theory, the avian cerebrum is almost entirely composed of basal ganglia, the basal ganglia is involved in only instinctive behaviour, and the malleable behaviour that is thought to typify mammals exclusively requires the so-called neocortex. However, towards the end of the twentieth century, there accumulated a wealth of evidence that these viewpoints were incorrect. The avian cerebrum has a large pallial territory that performs functions similar to those of the mammalian cortex. Although the avian pallium is nuclear, and the mammalian cortex is laminar in organization, the avian pallium supports cognitive abilities similar to, and for some species more advanced than, those of many mammals. To eliminate these misconceptions, an international forum of neuroscientists (BOX 1) has, for the first time in 100 years, developed new terminology that more accurately reflects our current understanding of the avian cerebrum and its homologies with mammals. This change in terminology is part of a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution.In this article, we summarize the traditional view of telencephalic evolution before reviewing more recent findings and insights. We then present the new nomenclature that has been Correspondence to Erich Jarvis at the

Recent studies of the limbic system of tetrapods have made data available that challenge some of the long-held tenets of forebrain evolution. Using the basic principle of parsimony – that the best hypotheses concerning homologies are those requiring the fewest number of evolutionary changes – we have reevaluated comparisons of tetrapod limbic systems. Given the current data, the following points appear to be justified: (1) the common ancestors of reptiles and mammals had a well-developed limbic system in which the basic subdivisions and connections of the amygdalar nuclei were established; (2) the ventral part of the lateral pallium in amphibians appears to be a single structure which corresponds to at least four areas in reptiles: centromedial DVR, ventral anterior amygdala, lateral amygdala, and part of the lateral cortex; (3) the medial pallium in amphibians appears to be homologous with the dorsal and medial cortices in reptiles and with the general and hippocampal cortices in mammals; (4) the cortical targets of the main olfactory bulb in reptiles and mammals appear to be homologous, and their common ancestor probably had a corresponding olfactory pallial field; (5) the targets of the accessory olfactory bulb in amphibians, reptiles, and mammals appear to be homologous, with the exception of nucleus sphericus in reptiles, which lacks an obvious homologue in non-reptiles.

We have reinvestigated the embryonic development of the vestibulocochlear system in mice using anterograde and retrograde tracing techniques. Our studies reveal that rhombomeres 4 and 5 include five motor neuron populations. One of these, the abducens nucleus, will not be dealt with here. Rhombomere 4 gives rise to three of the remaining populations: the facial branchial motor neurons; the vestibular efferents; and the cochlear efferents. The migration of the facial branchial motor neurons away from the otic efferents is completed by 13.5 days post coitum (dpc). Subsequently the otic efferents separate into the vestibular and cochlear efferents, and complete their migration by 14.5 dpc. In addition to their common origin, all three populations have perikarya that migrate via translocation through secondary processes, form a continuous column upon completion of their migrations, and form axonal tracts that run in the internal facial genu. Some otic efferent axons travel with the facial branchial motor nerve from the internal facial genu and exit the brain with that nerve. These data suggest that facial branchial motor neurons and otic efferents are derived from a common precursor population and use similar cues for pathway recognition within the brain. In contrast, rhombomere 5 gives rise to the fourth population to be considered here, the superior salivatory nucleus, a visceral motor neuron group. Other differences between this group and those derived from rhombomere 4 include perikaryal migration as a result of translocation first through primary processes and only then through secondary processes, a final location lateral to the branchial motor/otic efferent column, and axonal tracts that are completely segregated from those of the facial branchial and otic efferents throughout their course inside the brain. Analysis of the peripheral distribution of the cochlear efferents and afferents show that efferents reach the spiral ganglion at 12.5 dpc when postmitotic ganglion cells are migrating away from the cochlear anlage. The efferents begin to form the intraganglionic spiral bundle by 14.5 dpc and the inner spiral bundle by 16.5 dpc in the basal turn. They have extensive collaterals among supporting cells of the greater epithelial ridge from 16.5 dpc onwards. Afferents and efferents in the basal turn of the cochlea extend through all three rows of outer hair cells by 18.5 dpc. Selective labeling of afferent fibers at 20.5 dpc (postnatal day 1) shows that although some afferents are still in early developmental stages, some type II spiral ganglion cells already extend for long distances along the outer hair cells, and some type I spiral ganglion cells end on a single inner hair cell. These data support previous evidence that in mice the early outgrowth of afferent and efferent fibers is essentially achieved by birth.

The afferent connections to five cortical regions in two distantly related species of lizards (Gekko gecko and Iguana iguana) were studied by means of retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase conjugated to wheat germ agglutinin. Each of the five cortical regions is characterized by a specific pattern of projections from telencephalic, thalamic, hypothalamic, and brainstem regions. Subdivisions within the five cortical regions also receive different patterns of projections. The thalamo-cortical projections are as follows: The small-celled mediodorsal cortex receives a projection from nucleus dorsolateralis anterior pars magnocellularis. The large-celled mediodorsal cortex receives projections from nucleus dorsolateralis anterior pars parvicellularis and pars magnocellularis. The dorsal cortex receives a projection from nucleus dorsolateralis anterior pars parvicellularis. The lateral cortex receives a projection from nucleus dorsolateralis anterior pars magnocellularis. The pallial thickening receives projections from nucleus dorsomedialis and nucleus intercalatus. The latter nucleus receives a direct retinal projection. Thus, the pallial thickening is the recipient of a retino-thalamocortical projection. To date, comparisons of data from experimental studies have suggested that the cortical regions in lizards and turtles may be organized differently. However, the results of the present study suggest that the organization of cortical regions among reptiles is more similar than previously realized.