We compared qualitative aspects of the sensory experience of exertional breathlessness in normal subjects and in patients with chronic airflow limitation (CAL) and sought a physiologic rationale for these. Twelve patients (66 +/- 2 yr of age, mean +/- SEM) with severe CAL (FEV1 = 37 +/- 5% predicted) and 12 age-matched normal subjects (FEV1 = 103 +/- 5% predicted) were studied. Perceived inspiratory difficulty (BorgIN), inspiratory effort (esophageal pressure expressed as a fraction of maximal esophageal pressure at isovolume [Pes/PImax]), breathing pattern, and operational lung volumes (end-expiratory/inspiratory lung volumes [EELV/EILV]) were measured during symptom-limited incremental cycle exercise testing and compared at a standard VO2 of 50% predicted maximum in normal subjects and in patients with CAL. Qualitative descriptors of breathlessness were selected immediately after exercise. Breathlessness was qualitatively different between normal subjects and patients with CAL. Both normal subjects and patients with CAL chose descriptors of increased "work/effort" and "heaviness" of breathing; however, only patients with CAL consistently chose descriptors denoting "increased inspiratory difficulty" (75%), "unsatisfied inspiratory effort" (75%), and "shallow breathing" (50%). Stepwise regression analysis identified the ratio of Pes/PImax to VT/predicted VC as the strongest correlate of standardized BorgIN (n = 24, r = 0.86, p < 0.001). This latter measurement, which reflects the relationship between effort and ventilatory output, correlated strongly with dynamic EELV/TLC at isotime (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the qualitatively discrete respiratory sensations of exertional inspiratory difficulty peculiar to patients with CAL may have their origins in thoracic hyperinflation and the resultant disparity between inspiratory effort and ventilatory output.
We compared qualitative and quantitative aspects of perceived exertional dyspnea in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and normal subjects and sought a physiological rationale for their differences. Twelve patients with ILD [forced vital capacity = 64 +/- 4 (SE) %predicted] and 12 age-matched normal subjects performed symptom-limited incremental cycle exercise tests with measurements of dyspnea intensity (Borg scale), ventilation, breathing pattern, operational lung volumes, and esophageal pressures (Pes). Qualitative descriptors of dyspnea were selected at exercise cessation. Both groups described increased "work and/or effort" and "heaviness" of breathing; only patients with ILD described "unsatisfied inspiratory effort" (75%), "increased inspiratory difficulty" (67%), and "rapid breathing" (58%) (P < 0.05 patients with ILD vs. normal subjects). Borg-O2 uptake (VO2) and Borg-ventilation slopes were significantly greater during exercise in patients with ILD (P < 0.01). At peak exercise, when dyspnea intensity and inspiratory effort (Pes-to-maximal inspiratory pressure ratio) were similar, the distinct qualitative perceptions of dyspnea in patients with ILD were attributed to differences in dynamic ventilatory mechancis, i.e., reduced inspiratory capacity, heightened Pes-to-tidal volume ratio, and tachypnea. Factors contributing to dyspnea intensity in both groups were also different: the best correlate of the Borg-VO2 slope in patients with ILD was the resting tidal volume-to-inspiratory capacity ratio (r = 0.58, P < 0.05) and in normal subjects was the slope of Pes-to-maximal inspiratory pressure ratio over VO2 (r = 0.60, P < 0. 05).
Most hip-fracture-surgery patients did not receive effective antibiotic prophylaxis as required to prevent serious wound infections. This important variable can be included for surveillance, so that corrective measures can be taken to assure effective prophylactic antibiotic administration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.