No abstract

Postural instability and balance impairment are disabling symptoms in patients with acute unilateral peripheral vestibular hypofunction (UVH). Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is known to improve the vestibular compensation process, but (1) its effect on posture recovery remains poorly understood, (2) little is known about when VR must be done, and (3) whether the degree of vestibular loss matters is uncertain. We analyzed posture control under static (stable support) and dynamic (unstable support) postural tasks performed in different visual conditions [eye open (EO); eyes closed (EC); and optokinetic stimulation] using dynamic posturography. Non-linear analyses of the postural performance (wavelet transform, diffusion analysis, and fractal analysis) were performed in two groups of patients with UVH subjected to the same VR program based on the unidirectional rotation paradigm and performed either early (first 2 weeks) or later (fifth to the sixth week) after vertigo attack. Distribution of the angular horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) gain values recorded on the hypofunction side before rehabilitation differentiated two distinct sub-groups (cluster analysis) with aVOR gains below or above 0.20. The postural performance of the four sub-groups of patients with UVH (early rehabilitation with aVOR gain <0.20: n = 25 or gain >0.20: n = 19; late rehabilitation with aVOR gain <0.20: n = 15 or gain >0.20: n = 10) tested before VR showed significantly altered postural parameters compared with healthy controls. Greater instability, higher energy to control posture, larger sway without feedback corrections, and lower time of automatic control of posture were observed in static conditions. The four sub-groups recovered near-normal postural performance after VR in the EO and EC conditions, but still exhibited altered postural performance with optokinetic stimulation. In dynamic posturography conditions and before VR, the percentage of patients able to perform the postural tasks with EC and optokinetic stimulation was significantly lower in the two sub-groups with aVOR gain <0.20. After VR, the improvement of the postural parameters depended on the stage of rehabilitation and the degree of vestibular hypofunction. The best balance function recovery was found in the sub-group with early VR and pre-rehabilitation aVOR gain above 0.20, the worst in the sub-group with late rehabilitation and aVOR gain below 0.20. These differences were seen when the vestibular input remains the main sensory cue to control balance, that is, on unstable support without vision or altered visual motion cues. These findings extend to dynamic balance recovery the crucial roles of early rehabilitation and degree of vestibular hypofunction which we have already highlighted for vestibulo-ocular reflex recovery.

BACKGROUND: The crucial role of early vestibular rehabilitation (VR) to recover a dynamic semicircular canal function was recently highlighted in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH). However, wide inter-individual differences were observed, suggesting that parameters other than early rehabilitation are involved. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine to what extent the degree of vestibular loss assessed by the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) gain could be an additional parameter interfering with rehabilitation in the recovery process. And to examine whether different VR protocols have the same effectiveness with regard to the aVOR recovery. METHODS: The aVOR gain and the percentage of compensatory saccades were recorded in 81 UVH patients with the passive head impulse test before and after early VR (first two weeks after vertigo onset: N = 43) or late VR (third to sixth week after onset: N = 38) performed twice a week for four weeks. VR was performed either with the unidirectional rotation paradigm or gaze stability exercises. Supplementary outcomes were the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) score, and the static and dynamic subjective visual vertical. RESULTS: The cluster analysis differentiated two distinct populations of UVH patients with pre-rehab aVOR gain values on the hypofunction side below 0.20 (N = 42) or above 0.20 (N = 39). The mean gain values were respectively 0.07±0.05 and 0.34±0.12 for the lateral canal (p <  0.0001), 0.09±0.06 and 0.44±0.19 for the anterior canal (p <  0.0001). Patients with aVOR gains above 0.20 and early rehab fully recovered dynamic horizontal canal function (0.84±0.14) and showed very few compensatory saccades (18.7% ±20.1%) while those with gains below 0.20 and late rehab did not improve their aVOR gain value (0.16±0.09) and showed compensatory saccades only (82.9% ±23.7%). Similar results were found for the anterior canal function. Recovery of the dynamic function of the lateral canal was found with both VR protocols while it was observed with the gaze stability exercises only for the anterior canal. All the patients reduced their DHI score, normalized their static SVV, and exhibited uncompensated dynamic SVV. CONCLUSIONS: Early rehab is a necessary but not sufficient condition to fully recover dynamic canal function. The degree of vestibular loss plays a crucial role too, and to be effective rehabilitation protocols must be carried out in the plane of the semicircular canals.