No abstract

Why vestibular compensation (VC) after an acute unilateral vestibular loss is the neuro-otologist’s best friend is the question at the heart of this paper. The different plasticity mechanisms underlying VC are first reviewed, and the authors present thereafter the dual concept of vestibulo-centric versus distributed learning processes to explain the compensation of deficits resulting from the static versus dynamic vestibular imbalance. The main challenges for the plastic events occurring in the vestibular nuclei (VN) during a post-lesion critical period are neural protection, structural reorganization and rebalance of VN activity on both sides. Data from animal models show that modulation of the ipsilesional VN activity by the contralateral drive substitutes for the normal push–pull mechanism. On the other hand, sensory and behavioural substitutions are the main mechanisms implicated in the recovery of the dynamic functions. These newly elaborated sensorimotor reorganizations are vicarious idiosyncratic strategies implicating the VN and multisensory brain regions. Imaging studies in unilateral vestibular loss patients show the implication of a large neuronal network (VN, commissural pathways, vestibulo-cerebellum, thalamus, temporoparietal cortex, hippocampus, somatosensory and visual cortical areas). Changes in gray matter volume in these multisensory brain regions are structural changes supporting the sensory substitution mechanisms of VC. Finally, the authors summarize the two ways to improve VC in humans (neuropharmacology and vestibular rehabilitation therapy), and they conclude that VC would follow a “top-down” strategy in patients with acute vestibular lesions. Future challenges to understand VC are proposed.

Vestibular inputs tonically activate the anti-gravitative leg muscles during normal standing in humans, and visual information and proprioceptive inputs from the legs are very sensitive sensory loops for body sway control. This study investigated the postural control in a homogeneous population of 50 unilateral vestibular-deficient patients (Ménière's disease patients). It analyzed the postural deficits of the patients before and after surgical treatment (unilateral vestibular neurotomy) of their diseases and it focused on the visual contribution to the fine regulation of body sway. Static posturographic recordings on a stable force-plate were done with patients with eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC). Body sway and visual stabilization of posture were evaluated by computing sway area with and without vision and by calculating the percentage difference of sway between EC and EO conditions. Ménière's patients were examined when asymptomatic, 1 day before unilateral vestibular neurotomy, and during the time-course of recovery (1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year). Data from the patients were compared with those recorded in 26 healthy, age- and sex-matched participants. Patients before neurotomy exhibited significantly greater sway area than controls with both EO (+52%) and EC (+93%). Healthy participants and Ménière's patients, however, displayed two different behaviors with EC. In both populations, 54% of the subjects significantly increased their body sway upon eye closure, whereas 46% exhibited no change or significantly swayed less without vision. This was statistically confirmed by the cluster analysis, which clearly split the controls and the patients into two well-identified subgroups, relying heavily on vision (visual strategy, V) or not (non-visual strategy, NV). The percentage difference of sway averaged +36.7%+/-10.9% and -6.2%+/-16.5% for the V and NV controls, respectively; +45.9%+/-16.8% and -4.2%+/-14.9% for the V and NV patients, respectively. These two distinct V and NV strategies seemed consistent over time in individual subjects. Body sway area was strongly increased in all patients with EO early after neurotomy (1 and 2 weeks) and regained preoperative values later on. In contrast, sway area as well as the percentage difference of sway were differently modified in the two subgroups of patients with EC during the early stage of recovery. The NV patients swayed more, whereas the V patients swayed less without vision. This surprising finding, indicating that patients switched strategies with respect to their preoperative behavior, was consistently observed in 45 out of the 50 Ménière's patients during the whole postoperative period, up to 1 year. We concluded that there is a differential weighting of visual inputs for the fine regulation of posture in both healthy participants and Ménière's patients before surgical treatment. This differential weighting was correlated neither with age or sex factors, nor with the clinical variables at our disposal in the patients. It can be accounted fo...

No abstract