For Mohs surgical wounds that show exposed bone (ie, bone denuded of periosteum), healing by secondary intention may be preferable to surgical reconstruction. To determine the appropriateness of secondary intention healing, we reviewed surgical outcome in 205 patients with Mohs wounds of the scalp and forehead that had healed by secondary intention. Of these patients, 38 had Mohs wounds showing exposed bone. The mean area of exposed bone was 1074 mm(2); the mean area of exposed soft tissue was 1575 mm(2). The mean time for wounds with intact periosteum to epithelialize was 7 weeks; the mean time for bare bone to epithelialize was 13 weeks. All wounds healed without infection or tissue breakdown. We conclude that secondary intention healing of scalp and forehead wounds showing exposed bone is a safe and effective method of wound management after Mohs surgery.
Wounds of the lip and chin resulting from microscopically controlled (Mohs) surgery are often repaired immediately. However, wounds allowed to heal by secondary intention have the advantage of optimal cancer surveillance, simplified wound care, and avoidance of the costs and potential complications associated with reconstructive procedures. Accurate prediction of the course of wound healing would allow a rational approach to selection of surgery or healing by secondary intention. The authors evaluated 105 patients with defects of the lip and chin after Mohs excision for cancer who healed by secondary intention. Forty-six patients treated surgically were followed for comparison. The lip and chin were divided into subunits and the wound location, size, and depth were recorded. Patients were followed at intervals and a final determination regarding cosmesis was made after 6 or more months. It is concluded that the final cosmetic result can be confidently predicted on the basis of location by subunit, size, and depth of the wound.
Background Skin cancers are the most common malignancy in New Zealand and their treatment imparts a huge burden on the healthcare system both in terms of the cost of surgical intervention and in treatment delivery (estimates are in excess of NZ$33 million per annum for the year 2000). Currently in New Zealand, skin cancers are excised by dermatologists, general practitioners (GPs), GPs with a special interest in skin surgery (GPSIs) and specialist surgeons with diverse training backgrounds including ear, nose and throat, ophthalmic and general surgeons. To date there is scant literature evaluating complete excision rates following surgical treatment of skin cancer between these vocational groups. Objectives To review retrospectively pathology reports from all skin excisions sent to one private pathology laboratory over three consecutive months. The aim was to investigate the margins of excision and completeness of skin cancer surgery performed by each vocational group. Methods A retrospective analysis of skin pathology reports was undertaken for a 3-month period between April and June 2007. Raw data obtained from the pathology reports included diagnosis, completeness of excision, size of specimens, body site and vocational group of the medical practitioner performing the surgery. Results In total, 1532 lesions were excised: 432 benign and 1100 malignant. Six hundred and seven were from the head and neck. Dermatologists excised 276 lesions of which 93% were malignant, 55% were from the head and neck, and 0% were incompletely excised. GPs excised 633 lesions: 63% malignant, 30% head and neck, 23% incomplete excision of malignant lesions. GPSIs excised 368 lesions: 71% malignant, 35% head and neck, 21.5% incomplete malignant excision. Specialist surgeons excised 255 lesions: 72% malignant, 53% head and neck, 20% incomplete malignant excision. Conclusion GPs and GPSIs excised more benign lesions and had higher incomplete excision rates of skin cancer surgery than dermatologists. Incomplete excision rates for the vocational groups ranged from 0% to 45% depending on site and pathology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.