Numerous anatomic structures are at risk when performing ankle arthroscopy through the more commonly utilized portals. The purpose of this paper was to demonstrate the relative safety of each of the arthroscopic portal and Acufex external ankle distractor pin sites by measuring their proximity to the neurovascular structures surrounding the ankle joint. Six fresh cadaver specimens and 12 fresh-frozen, below-knee amputations were utilized for this study. An Acufex ankle distractor was applied using the standard technique. Anteromedial, anterolateral, anterocentral, posterolateral, and posteromedial portals were placed using an 11-blade scalpel to make 5-mm longitudinal incisions. The joint capsule was penetrated and a 3-mm arthroscope was placed into the ankle joint. The skin surrounding each of the portals was carefully removed and the proximity of any nerves or vessels was measured with respect to the arthroscope. At least one incidence of contact or penetration of a nerve or vessel was noted for each site. The anterocentral portal was at greatest risk for nerve or vessel damage. The anterolateral, anteromedial, and posterolateral portals were the safest areas for portal placement, with no penetration of neurovascular structures in any case.

No abstract

A new, high resolution, pressure-sensitive insole was tested and found to provide reproducible measurements of static and dynamic plantar pressures inside the shoe of normal test subjects under certain conditions. However, calibration between separate sensors was poor and the sensor pads showed significant wear with use. This system was also used to investigate the effect of heel wedges on plantar foot pressure to determine whether this system was sensitive enough to detect the effect of a gross shoe modification on plantar foot pressure. Medial heel wedges decreased plantar pressures under the first and second metatarsals as well as under the first toe, and shifted the center of force laterally in all portions of the foot. Lateral heel wedges decreased pressures under the third, fourth, and fifth metatarsals, increased pressures under the first and second metatarsals, and shifted the center of force medially in all portions of the foot. Our evaluations indicate that it is possible to measure static and dynamic plantar foot pressures within shoes and to study the possible effect of shoe modifications on plantar pressures in controlled gait trials.