There is increasing interest in flies as potentially important pollinators. Flies are known to have a complex visual system, including 4 spectral classes of photoreceptors that contribute to the perception of color. Our current understanding of how color signals are perceived by flies is based on data for the blowfly Lucilia sp., which after being conditioned to rewarded monochromatic light stimuli, showed evidence of a categorical color visual system. The resulting opponent fly color space has 4 distinct categories, and has been used to interpret how some fly pollinators may perceive flower colors. However, formal proof that flower flies (Syrphidae) only use a simple, categorical color process remains outstanding. In free-flying experiments, we tested the hoverfly Eristalis tenax, a Batesian mimic of the honeybee, that receives its nutrition by visiting flowers. Using a range of broadband similar–dissimilar color stimuli previously used to test color perception in pollinating hymenopteran species, we evaluated if there are steep changes in behavioral choices with continuously increasing color differences as might be expected by categorical color processing. Our data revealed that color choices by the hoverfly are mediated by a continuous monotonic function. Thus, these flies did not use a categorical processing, but showed evidence of a color discrimination function similar to that observed in several bee species. We therefore empirically provide data for the minimum color distance that can be discriminated by hoverflies in fly color space, enabling an improved understanding of plant–pollinator interactions with a non-model insect species.

Plant-pollinator interactions provide a natural experiment in signal evolution. Flowers are known to have evolved colour signals that maximise their ease of detection by the visual systems of important pollinators such as bees. Whilst most angiosperms are bee pollinated, our understanding on how the second largest group of pollinating insects, flies, may influence flower colour evolution is limited to the use of categorical models of colour discrimination that do not reflect the small colour differences commonly observed between and within flower species. Here we show by comparing flower signals that occur in different environments including total absence of bees, a mixture of bee and fly pollination within one plant family (Orchidaceae) from a single community, and typical flowers from a broad taxonomic sampling of the same geographic region, that perceptually different colours, empirically measured, do evolve in response to different types of insect pollinators. We show evidence of both convergence among fly-pollinated floral colours but also of divergence and displacement of colour signals in the absence of bee pollinators. Our findings give an insight into how both ecological and agricultural systems may be affected by changes in pollinator distributions around the world.

Although many plant species are reliant on insect pollination, agricultural plant breeding programs have primarily focused on traits that appeal to growers and consumers, rather than on floral traits that enhance pollinator attraction. In some vegetable seed production systems, this has led to declining pollinator attraction and poor seed yields. We predicted that low-yielding crop varieties would be less attractive to pollinators due to deficiencies in nectar rewards or volatile floral attractants. To test our prediction, we used a chemical phenotyping approach to examine how floral chemical traits of five carrot lines affect honey bee visitation. In bioassays, honey bees avoided feeders containing nectar from all carrot lines indicating a general non-attractant effect. Certain compounds in carrot flowers and nectar not only failed to elicit attraction but functioned as repellents, including the sesquiterpenes alpha-selinene and beta-selinene. Others enhanced attraction, e.g. beta-ocimene. The repellent sesquiterpenes have previously been implicated in plant defense suggesting a fine balance between pollination and plant protection, which when disrupted in artificial selection in plant breeding programs can impact the crop yield. These new insights highlight the importance of bioactive compounds in attracting pollinators toward floral resources in both ecological and agricultural settings.