No abstract

Spatial distributions of fished species must be well characterized to avoid local depletions, identify critical habitat, and predict and mitigate interactions with other fisheries. The Bristol Bay red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) fishery is one of the largest crab fisheries in Alaska. Summer crab distributions have been well documented by decades of bottom trawl surveys. However, crab movement and distribution are poorly understood outside the summer survey period, which creates several management challenges. One important component of fishery management is the existence of no-trawl zones, which are intended to protect crab from bottom trawl fisheries. However, it is difficult to evaluate the placement of no-trawl zones, because most crab bycatch occurs in trawl fisheries during winter when crab distributions are unknown. Daily fishing logs, kept by skippers in the red king crab fleet since 2005, contain detailed information on the spatial distribution of catch and effort of legal sized male crab during the autumn crab fishery. However, data contained in these hand-written logbooks have not been readily accessible. We digitized daily fishing logs from 2005 to 2016 and used spatial information on catch and effort to infer geographic distributions of legal sized male king crab during the crab fishing season. Changes in distribution were tracked across this 12-yr period and comparisons were made between warm and cold temperature regimes. In warm years (2005, 2014–2016), crab aggregated in the center of Bristol Bay, Alaska, while in cold years (2007–2013) they were closer to the Alaska Peninsula. The majority of crab were caught in no-trawl areas (63.4% on average), but variations occurred among years and with temperature regime (40.0–86.8% in no-trawl zones). As temperatures continue to shift in the Bering Sea, it will be important to continue monitoring crab distributions outside the summer survey period.

Most solitary marine eggs are shed into the plankton. Presumably the seafloor is more dangerous than the plankton for small solitary embryos, but estimates of benthic mortality of solitary embryos are few. To assess risk, we introduced suspensions of sinking, early stage embryos into conical chambers whose basal surfaces differed in mesh size and distance of mesh from the sediment surface. Surviving embryos hatched as blastulae and swam upward into an apical collection tube, later removed for counting. Test embryos were of a clypeasteroid echinoid. The two test sites, within a coastal lagoon in the NE Pacific, differed in sediments. At both sites, mean proportion of embryos retrieved was 0 and near 0 in chambers floored with 0.9 mm and 0.08 mm meshes at the sediment surface, but greater in chambers floored with a 0.08 mm mesh about 6 cm above the sediment (0.40 and 0.42) and also with a different chamber design with finer (0.055 mm) mesh at the sediment (0.42). Mean proportion retrieved was still greater (0.68 and 0.67) with chambers floored with a complete barrier at the sediment surface and similar to retrieval with chambers in laboratory aquaria without sediment. Estimated mortality rates for embryos on the sediment exceeded published estimates from the plankton. The results support the hypothesis that solitary eggs are released to the plankton because of benthic risks. This method can be used at varied sites on the seafloor, with varied embryos, and with varied protective barriers to test the generality of these results.

No abstract