SumlnaryCD14 is a 55-kD protein found as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein on the surface of monocytes, macrophages, and polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and as a soluble protein in the blood. Both forms of CD14 participate in the serum-dependent responses of cells to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). While CD14 has been described as a receptor for complexes of LPS with LPS-binding protein (LBP), there has been no direct evidence showing whether a ternary complex of LPS, LBP, and CD14 is formed, or whether CD14 binds LPS directly. Using nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (native PAGE), we show that recombinant soluble CD14 (rsCD14) binds LPS in the absence of LBP or other proteins. Binding of LPS to CD14 is stable and of low stoichiometry (one or two molecules of LPS per rsCD14). Recombinant LBP (rLBP) does not form detectable ternary complexes with rsCD14 and LPS, but it does accelerate the binding of LPS to rsCD14, rLBP facilitates the interaction of LPS with rsCD14 at substoichiometric concentrations, suggesting that LBP functions catalytically, as a lipid transfer protein. Complexes of LPS and rsCD14 formed in the absence of LBP or other serum proteins strongly stimulate integrin function on PMN and expression of E-selectin on endothelial cells, demonstrating that LBP is not necessary for CD14-dependent stimulation of cells. These results suggest that CD14 acts as a soluble and cell surface receptor for LPS, and that LBP may function primarily to accelerate the binding of LPS to CD14. R cent work has described several serum and cell surface proteins that are necessary for responses of leukocytes to low concentrations of bacterial LPS (endotoxin) (1). LPSbinding protein (LBP),I an acute phase reactant, binds LPS (2) and greatly enhances the sensitivity of cells to LPS (3). Normal serum and plasma also enhance responses to LPS, and a multicomponent factor termed septin has been proposed to serve this function (4). LBP (5) and septin (4) each bind to LPS-coated particles and promote the interaction of these particles with CD14 (6, 7), a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein of monocytes, macrophages, and PMN (8, 9, 10). CD14 is necessary for serum-or LBPmediated responses of cells to LPS, such as the production 1 Abbreviations used in this paper: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; ELPS, sheep erythrocytes coated with LPS; ELPS-LBP, ELPS opsonized with LBP; GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; HAP, Dulbecco's PBS with 0.5 U/ml aprotinin, 0.05% human serum albumin, 3 mM D-glucose; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; LBP, LPS-binding protein; NHP, normal human plasma; PD-EDTA, Dulbecco's PBS lacking Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ with 1 mM EDTA; Ra, strain R60; Re, strain R595; rLBP, recombinant LBP; rsCD14, recombinant soluble CD14. of TNF by monocytes (6) and an increase in the adhesive properties of 132-integrins on PMN (7).Cells that do not express CD14, such as endothelial cells, also respond to low concentrations of LPS in the presence of serum. We have shown that these resp...

Delivery of protein therapeutics often requires frequent injections because of low activity or rapid clearance, thereby placing a burden on patients and caregivers. Using glycoengineering, we have increased and prolonged the activity of proteins, thus allowing reduced frequency of administration. Glycosylation analogs with new N-linked glycosylation consensus sequences introduced into the protein were screened for the presence of additional N-linked carbohydrates and retention of in vitro activity. Suitable consensus sequences were combined in one molecule, resulting in glycosylation analogs of rHuEPO, leptin, and Mpl ligand. All three molecules had substantially increased in vivo activity and prolonged duration of action. Because these proteins were of three different classes (rHuEPO is an N-linked glycoprotein, Mpl ligand an O-linked glycoprotein, and leptin contains no carbohydrate), glycoengineering may be generally applicable as a strategy for increasing the in vivo activity and duration of action of proteins. This strategy has been validated clinically for glycoengineered rHuEPO (darbopoetin alfa).

Investigators using anti-EpoR antibodies for immunoblotting and immunostaining have reported erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) expression in nonhematopoietic tissues including human tumors. However, these antibodies detected proteins of 66 to 78 kDa, significantly larger than the predicted molecular weight of EpoR (56-57 kDa). We investigated the specificity of these antibodies and showed that they all detected non-EpoR proteins. C-20 detected 3 proteins in tumor cell lines (35, 66, and 100 kDa). Sequences obtained from preparative gels had similarity to the C-20-immunizing peptide. The 66-kDa protein was a heat shock protein (HSP70) to which antibody binding was abrogated in peptide competition experiments. Antibody M-20 readily identified a 59-kDa EpoR protein. However, neither M-20 nor C-20 was suitable for detection of EpoR using immunohistochemical methods. We concluded that these antibodies have limited utility for detecting EpoR. Thus, reports of EpoR expression in tumor cells using these antibodies should be viewed with caution. (Blood.

No abstract