No abstract

No abstract

Solvent casting/particulate leaching has been used to synthesize highly porous polymeric scaffolds of controlled pore size, based on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL). Obtained structures have a total porosity of c. 60%, with good interconnections between the pores. Porous scaffolds prepared using the greatest size of NaCl particles have the best mechanical properties. Both PMMA- and PCL-based materials can be sterilized by ionizing radiation. In the case of PCL-based scaffolds, irradiation causes cross-linking of polymer chains, which leads to an improvement of the mechanical properties of the scaffold. The compressive elastic modulus for non-porous samples increases with irradiation dose from 1.5 MPa for 0 kGy to 1.9 MPa for 280 kGy. Preliminary in vitro studies indicate good biocompatibility of both materials.

Hydrogel wound dressing makes easier the treatment of patients suffering from difficult wounds. A new process for the manufacturing of a sterile, packaged hydrogel wound dressing, based on an interpenetrating structure of calcium alginate, agar, and polyvinylpyrrolidone, was recently developed. The new formulation overtakes some previous technologies' drawbacks expressing a better resistance to mechanical deformations compared to products on the market. In this work, the 2.35 T proton density, spin-lattice relaxation time, spin-spin relaxation time, phase-coherence relaxation, and water apparent diffusion coefficient analysis in the new hydrogel and several alternative formulations, including a commercial one (Neoheal®), are reported. Specifically, the combination of agar, acting as a thermolabile forming agent, with calcium alginate and γ irradiated polyvinylpyrrolidone, acting, respectively, as physical, and chemical crosslinking agents with an irreversible (temperature independent) effect, have been investigated. The new hydrogel formulation brings a qualitative improvement in its handling due to its increased mechanical stiffness when compared to the commercial hydrogel reference. This comes together with a reduced water content (100 vs. 112 for proton density in arbitrary units) and swelling capacity (88% vs. 124%) but with improved water mobility (1.42 vs. 1.34 × 10−3 mm2 s−1 for the apparent diffusion coefficient).

No abstract