In our single-centre experience the CLIF-SOFA and the EASL-CLIF Consortium definition of ACLF proved to be strong predictors of short-term mortality in cirrhotic patients admitted for AD.
Background & Aims
An algorithm including Sepsis‐3 criteria and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) was recently proposed to predict severity of infection in cirrhosis. However, its applicability among patients without a baseline SOFA available for Sepsis‐3 definition is unknown. We sought to investigate the applicability and prognostic value of qSOFA and Sepsis‐3 criteria in patients with cirrhosis hospitalised for bacterial infections, without pre‐hospitalisation SOFA.
Methods
In this cohort study, 164 patients were followed up to 30 days. Data collection, including the prognostic models, was performed at admission and at day‐3.
Results
All patients fulfilled Sepsis‐3 criteria (admission SOFA ≥ 2) and, therefore, admission Sepsis‐3 was not included in further analysis. Admission qSOFA was an independent predictor of survival (HR = 2.271, P = 0.015). For patients initially classified as high risk by qSOFA, Chronic Liver Failure ‐ Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF‐SOFA) was the only prognostic predictor. Among patients initially classified as low risk by qSOFA, the following parameters evaluated at day‐3 were independent predictors of survival: qSOFA, acute‐on‐chronic liver failure, and Child‐Pugh classification. Although not independently related to survival, Sepsis‐3 criteria at day‐3 was associated with lower 30‐day survival in Kaplan‐Meier analysis (66% vs 85%, P = 0.008). However, prognosis was better predicted by day‐3 qSOFA, with 30‐day Kaplan‐Meier survival probability of 88% when qSOFA < 2 and 24% among those with qSOFA ≥ 2.
Conclusion
Sepsis‐3 criteria evaluated at admission are very limited in infected patients with cirrhosis without baseline SOFA. qSOFA was independently related to survival and appears to be a valuable tool for determining severity of infection and to follow patients initially classified as low risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.