Throughout life, new neurons are continuously added to the dentate gyrus. As this continuous addition remodels hippocampal circuits, computational models predict that neurogenesis leads to degradation or forgetting of established memories. Consistent with this, increasing neurogenesis after the formation of a memory was sufficient to induce forgetting in adult mice. By contrast, during infancy, when hippocampal neurogenesis levels are high and freshly generated memories tend to be rapidly forgotten (infantile amnesia), decreasing neurogenesis after memory formation mitigated forgetting. In precocial species, including guinea pigs and degus, most granule cells are generated prenatally. Consistent with reduced levels of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis, infant guinea pigs and degus did not exhibit forgetting. However, increasing neurogenesis after memory formation induced infantile amnesia in these species.
Although hippocampal-cortical interactions are crucial for the formation of enduring declarative memories, synaptic events that govern long-term memory storage remain mostly unclear. We present evidence that neuronal structural changes, i.e., dendritic spine growth, develop sequentially in the hippocampus and anterior cingulate cortex (aCC) during the formation of recent and remote contextual fear memory. We found that mice placed in a conditioning chamber for one 7 min conditioning session and exposed to five footshocks (duration, 2 s; intensity, 0.7 mA; interstimulus interval, 60 s) delivered through the grid floor exhibited robust fear response when returned to the experimental context 24 h or 36 d after the conditioning. We then observed that their fear response at the recent, but not the remote, time point was associated with an increase in spine density on hippocampal neurons, whereas an inverse temporal pattern of spine density changes occurred on aCC neurons. At each time point, hippocampal or aCC structural alterations were achieved even in the absence of recent or remote memory tests, thus suggesting that they were not driven by retrieval processes. Furthermore, ibotenic lesions of the hippocampus impaired remote memory and prevented dendritic spine growth on aCC neurons when they were performed immediately after the conditioning, whereas they were ineffective when performed 24 d later. These findings reveal that gradual structural changes modifying connectivity in hippocampal-cortical networks underlie the formation and expression of remote memory, and that the hippocampus plays a crucial but time-limited role in driving structural plasticity in the cortex.
Fragile X syndrome, the most frequent form of hereditary mental retardation, is due to a mutation of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene on the X chromosome. Like fragile X patients, FMR1-knockout (FMR1-KO) mice lack the normal fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) and show both cognitive alterations and an immature neuronal morphology. We reared FMR1-KO mice in a C57BL͞6 background in enriched environmental conditions to examine the possibility that experience-dependent stimulation alleviates their behavioral and neuronal abnormalities. FMR1-KO mice kept in standard cages were hyperactive, displayed an altered pattern of open field exploration, and did not show habituation. Quantitative morphological analyses revealed a reduction in basal dendrite length and branching together with more immatureappearing spines along apical dendrites of layer five pyramidal neurons in the visual cortex. Enrichment largely rescued these behavioral and neuronal abnormalities while increasing ␣-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) glutamate receptor subunit 1 (GluR1) levels in both genotypes. Enrichment did not, however, affect FMRP levels in the WT mice. These data suggest that FMRP-independent pathways activating glutamatergic signaling are preserved in FMR1-KO mice and that they can be elicited by environmental stimulation.fragile X mental retardation protein ͉ mental retardation ͉ FMR1 gene ͉ AMPA receptor ͉ dendritic spines S everal genes associated with mental retardation have been mapped on the X chromosome and, among them is the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. The fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) absence or mutation is responsible for the fragile X syndrome (FXS), which is the most common form of inherited mental retardation. Most of the individuals affected carry a trinucleotide repeat that, after methylation, leads to transcriptional silencing of the FMR1 gene (1). Patients with the FXS do not express FMRP and exhibit phenotypic traits ranging from severe (IQ 20) to moderate (IQ 60) mental retardation, defective attention, autistic behavior, and physical features including an elongated face, large ears, joint laxity, and macroorchidism (2-5).FMR1 is highly conserved between human and mouse, with a nucleotide and amino acid identity of 95% and 97%, respectively (6). The expression pattern of mouse FMR1 is similar to its human counterpart in both tissue specificity and timing (7). Interestingly, FMR1-knockout (FMR1-KO) mice, the mouse model for the FXS, lack the normal FMRP and show macroorchidism, hyperactivity, and mild learning deficits (8, 9) reminiscent of the human syndrome.One common brain feature of fragile X patients and of the mouse model for the syndrome is the presence of long and thin immature dendritic spines indicative of defective pruning during development (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). At the molecular level, it has been shown that protein synthesis triggered by the type I metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR1) agonist dihydroxyphenylglycine is dramati...
Remodeling of cortical connectivity is thought to allow initially hippocampus-dependent memories to be expressed independently of the hippocampus at remote time points. Consistent with this, consolidation of a contextual fear memory is associated with dendritic spine growth in neurons of the anterior cingulate cortex (aCC). To directly test whether such cortical structural remodeling is necessary for memory consolidation, we disrupted spine growth in the aCC at different times following contextual fear conditioning in mice. We took advantage of previous studies showing that the transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) negatively regulates spinogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. We found that increasing MEF2-dependent transcription in the aCC during a critical posttraining window (but not at later time points) blocked both the consolidation-associated dendritic spine growth and subsequent memory expression. Together, these data strengthen the causal link between cortical structural remodeling and memory consolidation and, further, identify MEF2 as a key regulator of these processes.structural plasticity | remote memory | viral vector I n experimental animals, damage to the hippocampus disproportionately impacts recently acquired memories, with relative sparing of remote memories (1-8). Such observations have led to the idea that the hippocampus is transiently required for memory expression, with remote memory expression being exclusively dependent on the cortex (9). According to one model (10), posttraining hippocampal activity coordinates reactivation of memory traces in the cortex. This reactivation leads to the remodeling of cortical connections, allowing the memory to eventually be expressed independently of the hippocampus. A recent study in mice (5) provided correlative evidence for posttraining remodeling of neurons in the anterior cingulate cortex (aCC), a subregion of the prefrontal cortex that plays an essential role in remote memory expression (11). Increases in dendritic spine density on layer 2/3 pyramidal aCC neurons were observed 1 mo, but not 1 d, following contextual fear conditioning (5). As layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons send and receive long-range cortical connections (12), such changes may contribute to increased functional connectivity between the aCC and other cortical areas important for remote memory expression (13,14). However, whether this increase in aCC spine density is necessary for memory consolidation is not known. To test this, it would be necessary to evaluate whether preventing posttraining spinogenesis, specifically in this region, disrupts memory consolidation.The transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) negatively regulates spinogenesis in an activity-dependent manner and therefore provides a tool to address this question. For example, increasing MEF2 function decreases the number of dendritic spines and excitatory synapses in vitro (15) and blocks increases in spine density normally observed following repeated cocaine administration in rat medium spiny...
Memory formation is thought to be mediated by dendritic-spine growth and restructuring. Myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) restricts spine growth in vitro, suggesting that this transcription factor negatively regulates the spine remodeling necessary for memory formation. Here we show that memory formation in adult mice was associated with changes in endogenous MEF2 levels and function. Locally and acutely increasing MEF2 function in the dentate gyrus blocked both learning-induced increases in spine density and spatial-memory formation. Increasing MEF2 function in amygdala disrupted fear-memory formation. We rescued MEF2-induced memory disruption by interfering with AMPA receptor endocytosis, suggesting that AMPA receptor trafficking is a key mechanism underlying the effects of MEF2. In contrast, decreasing MEF2 function in dentate gyrus and amygdala facilitated the formation of spatial and fear memory, respectively. These bidirectional effects indicate that MEF2 is a key regulator of plasticity and that relieving the suppressive effects of MEF2-mediated transcription permits memory formation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.