Background The risk factors of duodenal injury from distal migrated biliary plastic stents remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors of distal migration and its related duodenal injury in patients who underwent placement of a single biliary plastic stent for biliary strictures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients with biliary strictures who underwent endoscopic placement of a single biliary plastic stent from January 2006 to October 2017. Results Two hundred forty-eight patients with 402 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures were included. The incidence of distal migration was 6.2%. The frequency of duodenal injury was 2.2% in all cases and 36% in cases with distal migration. Benign biliary strictures (BBS), length of the stent above the proximal end of the stricture (> 2 cm), and duration of stent retention (< 3 months) were independently associated with distal migration (p = 0.018, p = 0.009, and p = 0.016, respectively). Duodenal injury occurred more commonly in cases with larger angle (≥ 30°) between the distal end of the stent and the centerline of the patient's body (p = 0.018) or in cases with stent retention < 3 months (p = 0.031). Conclusions The risk factors of distal migration are BBS and the length of the stent above the proximal end of the stricture. The risk factor of duodenal injury due to distal migration is large angle (≥ 30°) between the distal end of the stent and the centerline of the patient's body. Distal migration and related duodenal injury are more likely to present during the early period after biliary stenting.

Background Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has always been challenging for endoscopists, but the procedure can be facilitated after adequate exposure of submucosal layer and cutting line. We developed a traction method based on gravity for facilitating colorectal ESD, referred as magnetic bead-assisted ESD (MBA-ESD). This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of MBA-ESD and conventional ESD for treating large superficial colorectal tumors. Methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients with large (≥ 20 mm in their maximal diameter) superficial colorectal tumors who underwent MBA-ESD or conventional ESD at our endoscopy center between June 2017 to January 2018. Each patient in the MBA-ESD group was matched to a patient in the conventional ESD group using propensity scores. Results Thirteen patients in each group were matched for the analyses. The baseline characteristics were balanced after propensity matching. The incidence of overall complications was significantly lower in the matched MBA-ESD group (0% vs. 38.5%, P = 0.039), while similar rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, curative resection, and tumor recurrence were noted. Although without statistic difference, dissection time and speed were improved when using MBA-ESD (33 min vs. 40 min, P = 0.111; and 21 mm 2 /min vs. 16 mm 2 /min, P = 0.143, respectively). Conclusions MBA-ESD is a feasible, safe, and effective method for treating large superficial colorectal tumors. Further large, prospective and controlled studies are needed to fully assess this method.

Rationale: The management of complete obstruction of anastomosis following colorectal surgery is challenging. Some modified minimally invasive methods have been reported to be successfully implemented in some cases. In this case report, we present a case to share our experience. Patient concerns: A 64-year-old man underwent low anterior resection and single barrel ileostomy for rectal cancer 5 months ago. Completely obstructed anastomotic stenosis was found during colonoscopy. Diagnosis: Colonoscopy showed the anastomosis at 8 cm from the anal verge was completely obstructed. Interventions: A small incision was made by a needle knife, and then the stenosis was sequentially dilated by using a wire-guided balloon dilator. Outcomes: The luminal continuity was reestablished. The patient underwent successful ileostomy closure 2 months later. At 18-months follow-up, no restenosis of the anastomosis was observed during colonoscopy. Lessons: Endoscopic small incision with a needle knife along with balloon dilation could be an alternative method for patients with complete obstruction of anastomosis after colorectal resection. But this procedure should be performed with great caution in selected patients and performed only by highly experienced endoscopists.

No abstract

No abstract