Type V-A anti-CRISPR proteins (AcrVAs) represent the response from phages to the CRISPR-Cas12a prokaryotic immune system. CRISPR-Cas12a was repurposed, in high eukaryotes, to carry out gene editing and transcription regulation, the latter via a nuclease-dead Cas12a (dCas12a). Consequently, AcrVAs were adopted to regulate (d)­Cas12a activity. However, the usage of both dCas12a-based transcription factors and AcrVAs in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has not been explored. In this work, we show that, in the baker’s yeast, two dCas12a proteins (denAsCas12a and dLbCas12a) work both as activators (upon fusion to a strong activation domain) and repressors, whereas dMbCa12a is nonfunctional. The activation efficiency of dCas12a-ADs manifests a dependence on the number of crRNA binding sites, whereas it is not directly correlated to the amount of crRNA in the cells. Moreover, AcrVA1, AcrVA4, and AcrVA5 are able to inhibit dLbCa12a in yeast, and denAsCas12a is only inhibited by AcrVA1. However, AcrVA1 performs well at high concentration only. Coexpression of two or three AcrVAs does not enhance inhibition of dCas12a­(-AD), suggesting a competition between different AcrVAs. Further, AcrVA4 significantly limits gene editing by LbCas12a. Overall, our results indicate that dCas12a:crRNA and AcrVA proteins are highly performant components in S. cerevisiae synthetic transcriptional networks.

Type V-A CRISPR-(d)Cas system has been used in multiplex genome editing and transcription regulation in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. However, mRNA degradation through the endonuclease activity of Cas12a has never been studied. In this work, we present an efficient and powerful tool to induce mRNA degradation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae via the catalytic activity of (d)Cas12a on pre-crRNA structure. Our results point out that dFnCas12a, (d)LbCas12a, denAsCas12a and two variants (which carry either NLSs or NESs) perform significant mRNA degradation upon insertion of pre-crRNA fragments into the 5′- or 3′ UTR of the target mRNA. The tool worked well with two more Cas12 proteins—(d)MbCas12a and Casϕ2—whereas failed by using type VI LwaCas13a, which further highlights the great potential of type V-A Cas proteins in yeast. We applied our tool to the construction of Boolean NOT, NAND, and IMPLY gates, whose logic operations are fully based on the control of the degradation of the mRNA encoding for a reporter protein. Compared to other methods for the regulation of mRNA stability in yeast synthetic gene circuits (such as RNAi and riboswitches/ribozymes), our system is far easier to engineer and ensure very high performance.

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas (CRISPRassociated proteins), a prokaryotic RNA-mediated adaptive immune system, has been repurposed for gene editing and synthetic gene circuit construction both in bacterial and eukaryotic cells. In the last years, the emergence of the anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs), which are natural OFF-switches for CRISPR-Cas, has provided a new means to control CRISPR-Cas activity and promoted a further development of CRISPR-Cas-based biotechnological toolkits. In this review, we focus on type I and type V-A anti-CRISPR proteins. We first narrate Acrs discovery and analyze their inhibitory mechanisms from a structural perspective. Then, we describe their applications in gene editing and transcription regulation. Finally, we discuss the potential future usageand corresponding possible challenges-of these two kinds of anti-CRISPR proteins in eukaryotic synthetic gene circuits.

No abstract