The development of teaching skills in virtual education constituted a boom in times of the COVID-19 pandemic, therefore, the present aims to analyze the skills of Virtual Education in teachers in university extensions. This study was carried out following the guidelines of the positivist paradigm on quantitative bases. The field research was descriptive. Data collection was carried out through a survey in Likert format. The analysis of the data was carried out using the technique of descriptive statistics with an exploratory scope and from a bibliographic review for its theoretical and conceptual development. The results reflected that teachers occasionally manage virtual education specifically in the use of digital tools for their pedagogical action,however, the majority assumes the challenge given the uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic.

New technologies represent novelty depending on the era in which they are viewed, but in all cases they represent social evolution in some way. At present, new technologies are associated with the use of computer tools that strengthen processes, mechanisms, and undoubtedly, social communication. This paper evaluates new technologies focused on social transformations, their impact on human behavior and the social repercussions they may bring with their prevalence over time. Several academic documents of a scientific and technical nature are evaluated, with a view to defining the paradigms of technologies in their evolutionary process through societies. The most outstanding results show that the modern world is subject to a significant impact of information technology, that it encompasses not only educational aspects but also family, personal and economic aspects, and that the implications of traditional substitution by technology may be detrimental to mankind. Keywords: Technological implications, new societies, technological impact. References [1]C. Renfrew y P. Bahn, Arqueología: Teoría, métodos y práctica., Madrid: Akal, 1993. [2]Y. Laniuk, «Freedom in the Society of Control: Ethical challenges,» Ethics and Bioethics, vol. 10, nº 34, pp. 203-220, 2021. [3]J. Chaves, «Desarrollo tecnológico en la Primera Revolución Industrial,» Universidad de Extremadura, Servicio de Publicaciones, Extremadura, 2004. [4]A. Bessarab, O. Mitchuk, A. Baranetska, N. Kodatska, O. Kvasnytsia y G. Mykytiv, «Social networks as a phenomenon of the information society,» Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, vol. 14, nº 1, pp. 35-42, 2021. [5]E. Popkova, A. Bogoviz y B. Sergi, «Towards digital society management and ‘capitalism 4.0’ in contemporary Russia,» Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 8, nº 1, p. 77, 2021. [6]A. Núñez, «Riesgo e Incertidumbre en las Sociedades Tecnológicas complejas.,» Cuaderno del ateneo, pp. 44-57, 2007. [7]wikipedia, «Accidente del transbordador espacial Challenger,» 1989. [Online]. Available: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accidente_del_transbordador_espacial_Challenger. [Last access: 2021]. [8]J. Martínez, «La innovación tecnológica en las sociedades cooperativas y otras organizaciones de participación,» Rev.Est. Coop., vol. 48, 2001. [9]J. Echeverría, «Ética y sociedades tecnológicas,» Isegoría, vol. 41, pp. 217-229, 2009. [10]R. Pardo, «La cultura científico-tecnológica de las sociedades de la modernidad tardía,» Comunicar ciencia, vol. 51, pp. 35-86, 2001. [11]A. Zatls, «Metales, ambiente y las sociedades tecnológicas: ¿hacia dónde nos dirigimos?,» Química viva, vol. 10, nº 2, pp. 1-20, 2011.