The objective of this article is to compare various ethical issues considered by social scientists and research ethics committees in the evaluation of mental health social research protocols. We contacted 47 social scientists and 10 members of ethics committees in Mexico with two electronic national surveys that requested information from both groups related to the application of ethical principles in mental health social research. The results showed no significant difference between these groups in the value placed on the ethical issues explored. Based on this finding, we make proposals to strengthen the collaboration between the two groups.

Desde una perspectiva epidemiológica, el comportamiento suicida y el suicidio consumado conforman un creciente problema de salud pública por su impacto en la morbi-mortalidad de la población joven y económicamente activa, a nivel mundial y nacional. Por ello, desde los años setenta, se volvió esencial la identificación de factores de riesgo y de aquellos grupos con mayor vulnerabilidad para contribuir en la prevención de dicho comportamiento. En el presente documento se analizó literatura convencional y gris generada desde 1980 a 2014 sobre conducta suicida en población mexicana entre 15 y 29 años de edad. Se encontró que la mayoría de los documentos reportaron factores de riesgo, y sólo en un porcentaje mínimo (9.37%) se indagó sobre factores protectores. Por lo anterior, este trabajo tiene como objetivo señalar la tendencia que ha seguido la investigación sobre suicidio en México, así como la importancia de incluir un enfoque de salud para su estudio.

Resumen: Los comités de ética se encuentran entre las manifestaciones más visibles de la bioética. La aceptación que han recibido estas instancias en los últimos años ha sido amplia, pero poco se puede decir acerca de sus funciones y sus metas, principalmente porque se ha rezagado el estudio del trabajo al interior de los comités. El objetivo de este manuscrito es analizar los elementos circunscritos al proceso interno de los comités de ética que están dificultando su razonamiento deliberativo. Elementos como la ausencia de deliberación desde el saber ético, la tensión entre el marco ético y el legal, las particularidades del campo de la salud dentro del discernimiento ético y la consideración de los comités como grupos, deben reconocerse y discutirse en forma permanente y crítica como trabajo autorregulativo de los comités para, de esta manera, conseguir el consenso social e institucional. Palabras clave: comités de ética en investigación, ética, aspectos bioéticos Elements surrounding the ethics committees that hinder their deliberative reasoningAbstract: Ethics committees are among the most visible manifestations of bioethics. The acceptance these instances have received in recent years has been extensive, but little can be said about their roles and goals, mainly because the analysis of what happens inside the committees has been lagged behind. The aim of this paper is to analyze the elements involved in the inner processes of ethical committees, which are complicating their deliberative reasoning. Elements such as the absence of deliberation from ethical knowledge, the tension between the ethical and legal frameworks, the particularities of the health care field within ethical discernment and the consideration of committees as groups should be permanently and critically recognized and discussed, as self-regulatory work by committees, in order to achieve social and institutional consensus. Key words: research ethics committees, ethics, bioethics issues Elementos circundantes aos comitês de ética que dificultam a sua fundamentação deliberativaResumo: Os comitês de ética se encontram entre as manifestações mais visíveis da bioética. A aceitação que tiveram estas instâncias nos últimos anos foi ampla, porém pouco se pode dizer acerca de suas funções e metas, principalmente porque se tem postergado o estudo do trabalho no interior dos comitês. O objetivo deste manuscrito é analisar os elementos circunscritos ao processo interno dos comitês de ética que estão dificultando a sua fundamentação deliberativa. Elementos como a ausência de deliberação a partir do saber ético, a tensão entre o marco ético e o legal, as particularidades do campo da saúde dentro do discernimento ético e a consideração dos comitês como grupos, devem ser reconhecidos e discutidos de forma permanente e crítica como trabalho autorregulativo dos comitês para, desta maneira, conseguir o consenso social e institucional.Palavras-chave: comitês de ética em investigação, ética, aspectos bioéticos

Qualitative studies have become increasingly common and have been used in different fields such as economics, politics, psychology, sociology and health research for different purposes. Instead of collecting numerical data, qualitative research’s goal is to gather information from participant’s experiences and perceptions. One of the tools to get data related to the participants’ experiences in qualitative research is through interviews. One tool that may be helpful for researchers today are digital and video platforms that fall under the domain of the internet-mediated research. The aim of this work is to identify and describe some ethical controversies when using videoconferencing platforms in qualitative health research for interview purposes. Four cases related to the use of digital platforms (videotelephony systems) to conduct interviews in qualitative research were discussed. Rather than give solutions, we reflect upon the possibility and plausibility of using these telecommunication technologies when using the technique of interviews in qualitative research. The ethical issues that may arise when using these technologies are related to privacy, confidentiality, accuracy of information and expertise when using the platforms. We think that the researcher is committed to making the best decisions in favor of the participant when using digital tools to gather information. In this regard, qualitative researchers may be benefited by the reflections we present insofar they may consider these possible scenarios that may rise ethical issues when collecting data. The activity of research needs to be escorted by constant ethical deliberations to protect participants’ rights during the collection of data phase.

Introduction. The process of publication is influenced by a pressure on researchers to demonstrate their competence and productivity by publishing large numbers of articles in indexed journals. But there is a great deal of ignorance regarding the ethical obligations in scientific publication; worse, ethical considerations are often seen as mere formalities in the process of publishing an article. Objective. This article discusses the ethical practices related to the publication of a scientific article. It encompasses those defined by forms of external regulation and those that might be identified as forms of self-regulation, and it argues for the greater effectiveness of the latter in scientific publication. Method. We performed a literature review and a critical analysis of the information. Results. There are negative factors that range from plagiarism and the duplication of articles to the fabrication and falsification of data. Researchers look for convenient solutions, taking refuge in practices condoned, paradoxically, by the very scientific community that condemns them. Rather than avoiding these forms of misconduct, the scientific community even justifies them at times, which means that the practices continue. Discussion and conclusion. Self-regulation in scientific publication is a preferable goal: it allows participants in the process to assume their obligations freely and with a greater sense of responsibility.