The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is known to cause posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in immunosuppressed transplant patients. The results of this pilot study showed that all EBV- patients pretransplant experienced primary EBV infection within the first 3 months after transplant surgery. Virtually all of these patients had a higher burden of EBV-infected cells in their peripheral blood (PB) after infection by EBV than did the EBV+ pretransplant group when tested at the same intervals posttransplant. Salivary EBV titers also increased in most patients, but the difference between the two groups was statistically significant only at 12 months, whereupon EBV+ patients showed higher titers compared with EBV- (alpha < 0.053). Also, polymerase chain reaction amplification followed by Southern blotting was performed to detect EBV sequences in PB mononuclear cells. This technique allowed confirmation of the blood culture results and constituted a faster alternative compared with the culture assay. The highest increase in the number of EBV-infected lymphocytes at 3 months posttransplant obtained from PB was seen in a patient who developed fatal PTLD and in another with protracted infectious mononucleosis. Thus, the number of EBV-infected cells in PB was found to correlate positively with risk of development of PTLD at 3 months posttransplant in our group of pediatric transplant patients. This study showed that quantitative lymphocyte culture of PB was an accurate index of immunosuppression and a reliable method for assessing the risk of PTLD development.

A previous study (Savoie et al, Blood 83:2715, 1994) identified eight transplant patients who acquired Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection during the peritransplant period. Three of these patients subsequently developed B-cell lymphoproliferative disease within 4 months of transplantation. Among these, there was a 16-year-old liver transplant patient who was negative for EBV at the time of transplant and who received an EBV-negative organ. After transplant, this patient was transfused with 9 U of packed red blood cells. Eight of the donors were EBV-positive and one was EBV-negative. We succeeded in obtaining spontaneous lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from the blood of three of these donors, one of whom also yielded a cord-blood line established with his throat-wash EBV. Blood from a fourth donor did not yield an LCL, but his throat washing did have transforming activity when inoculated onto cord-blood leukocytes. We initially could establish spontaneous LCLs only from the recipient's blood. However, a throat- wash sample taken 11 weeks later did show transforming activity. The recipient was shown to have acquired the EBV infection from one of eight EBV-seropositive blood donors. Analysis of fragment length polymorphisms after polymerase chain reaction amplification of the EBV BamHI-K fragment was used to establish strain identity. Western blot analysis for existence of size polymorphisms in three classes of Epstein-Barr nuclear antigens (EBNA-1, EBNA-2, and EBNA-3) confirmed the DNA results. It is noteworthy that the blood donor responsible for transmitting his EBV strain to the recipient had experienced clinical infectious mononucleosis 15 months before donating blood. Our results may, thus, indicate a requirement for leukodepletion of blood destined for immunosuppressed EBV-negative patients. Finally, blood donors with a recent history of infectious mononucleosis should probably be identified so that their blood is not given to EBV-negative transplant patients.

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is known to cause posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in immunosuppressed transplant patients. The results of this pilot study showed that all EBV- patients pretransplant experienced primary EBV infection within the first 3 months after transplant surgery. Virtually all of these patients had a higher burden of EBV-infected cells in their peripheral blood (PB) after infection by EBV than did the EBV+ pretransplant group when tested at the same intervals posttransplant. Salivary EBV titers also increased in most patients, but the difference between the two groups was statistically significant only at 12 months, whereupon EBV+ patients showed higher titers compared with EBV- (alpha < 0.053). Also, polymerase chain reaction amplification followed by Southern blotting was performed to detect EBV sequences in PB mononuclear cells. This technique allowed confirmation of the blood culture results and constituted a faster alternative compared with the culture assay. The highest increase in the number of EBV-infected lymphocytes at 3 months posttransplant obtained from PB was seen in a patient who developed fatal PTLD and in another with protracted infectious mononucleosis. Thus, the number of EBV-infected cells in PB was found to correlate positively with risk of development of PTLD at 3 months posttransplant in our group of pediatric transplant patients. This study showed that quantitative lymphocyte culture of PB was an accurate index of immunosuppression and a reliable method for assessing the risk of PTLD development.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) early-antigen (EA) serologic profile was examined in conjunction with peripheral blood EBV DNA load, to assess its value in evaluating the risk of developing posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). The cohort included 26 pediatric recipients of solid-organ transplants, 6 of whom developed PTLD. All 6 patients had high peripheral blood EBV DNA loads. Of the remaining 20 patients who did not develop PTLD, 14 had high EBV DNA loads, and 6 had low EBV DNA loads. None of the patients who developed PTLD had significant EA immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers. However, all 14 patients with high EBV DNA loads and without PTLD had high EA IgG titers, either at the time of initial high EBV DNA load or during the ensuing weeks. Here, we report that EBV DNA load analysis, combined with EA serologic analysis, is a potentially useful prognostic marker for evaluating the risk of developing PTLD.

This study showed that only remifentanil prevented MAP increase without adverse effects such as bradycardia during DL, and prevented MAP decrease 30 min after PACU admission.