Tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over half of cancer clinicians reporting that they do not treat or provide a referral to cessation resources. This quality improvement study evaluated the procedures for assessing and documenting tobacco use among cancer survivors and referring current smokers to cessation resources at the University of Virginia Cancer Center. Process mapping revealed 20 gaps across two major domains: electronic health record (EHR), and personnel barriers. The top identified priority was inconsistent documentation of tobacco use status as it impacted several downstream gaps. Eleven of the 20 gaps were deemed a high priority, and all were addressed during the implementation of the resulting Tobacco Treatment Program. Prioritized gaps were addressed using a combination of provider training, modifications to clinical workflow, and EHR modifications. Since implementation of solutions, the number of unique survivors receiving cessation treatment has increased from 284 survivors receiving cessation support during Year 1 of the initiative to 487 in Year 3. The resulting Tobacco Treatment Program provides a systematic, personalized, and sustainable comprehensive cessation program that optimizes the multifaceted workflow of the Cancer Center and has the potential to reduce tobacco use in a population most in need of cessation support.

Residents of Southwest Virginia (SWVA) face significant barriers in accessing the most advanced forms of cancer care, cancer risk reduction, and clinical trials involvement. A collaboration between the University of Virginia (UVA) Cancer Center and UVA School of Nursing was forged with oncology caregivers in this region to build community capacity to support Cancer Clinical trials (CCT) by strengthening the workforce, and thus improving health outcomes for this underserved region of Appalachia. The UVA School of Nursing designed an educational workshop focusing on the basics of CCT to facilitate the development of a skilled nursing workforce in the SWVA region that could provide care to patients on protocol and/or to encourage residents to participate in trials. The goal of the workshop was to offer a CCT training session for oncology nurses that fostered the knowledge and skills necessary to facilitate and support CCT infrastructure across this high-risk region. This evaluation reports the learning outcomes of the CCT training on 32 nurse participants from SWVA. Evaluations of the training program showed high rates of satisfaction, increased comfort level with CCTs, and increased knowledge and attitude toward CCTs. These findings provide information about a curriculum that could be useful in educating other oncology nurses and student nurses how to care for patients who may be enrolled in a clinical trial. Nurses can also be advocates for participation in clinical trials once they have the knowledge and are comfortable in their own understanding of a trial's usefulness. Educating the nursing workforce is an essential component of building capacity and infrastructure to support clinical trials research.

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the USA, yet is highly preventable and detectable at an early stage through screening. Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) implemented a worksite colon cancer awareness program to increase colorectal cancer screening rates and preventive lifestyle behaviors among its employees. The Colon Cancer-Free Zone program is designed using best practice principles of worksite health programs and includes information sessions covering the topics of colorectal cancer, screening guidelines, insurance coverage, and preventive lifestyle behaviors. It is conducted in a campaign format that includes a strategic communication strategy targeting relevant screening barriers and facilitators, peer champions, and incentives. The program was implemented with VCE employees statewide utilizing a web-based system for the information sessions, and resulted in broad participation, a significant increase in screening self-efficacy (4.15 ± 0.64 vs 3.81 ± 0.76, ρ = 0.006), changes in diet and physical activity (50% and 40% of participants, respectively), and a 20.6% increase in the employee colorectal cancer screening rate. A Colon Cancer-Free Zone toolkit was developed for use by Extension Agents to implement the program at worksites in their service communities.

Background The objectives are to: 1) describe engagement processes used to prioritize and address regional comprehensive cancer control needs among a Community-Academic Advisory Board (CAB) in the medically-underserved, rural Appalachian region, and 2) detail longitudinal CAB evaluation findings. Methods This three-year case study (2017–2020) used a convergent parallel, mixed-methods design. The approach was guided by community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles, the Comprehensive Participatory Planning and Evaluation process, and Nine Habits of Successful Comprehensive Cancer Control Coalitions. Meeting artifacts were tracked and evaluated. CAB members completed quantitative surveys at three time points and semi-structured interviews at two time points. Quantitative data were analyzed using analysis of variance tests. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed via an inductive-deductive process. Results Through 13 meetings, Prevention and Early Detection Action Teams created causal models and prioritized four cancer control needs: human papillomavirus vaccination, tobacco control, colorectal cancer screening, and lung cancer screening. These sub-groups also began advancing into planning and intervention proposal development phases. As rated by 49 involved CAB members, all habits significantly improved from Time 1 to Time 2 (i.e., communication, priority work plans, roles/accountability, shared decision making, value-added collaboration, empowered leadership, diversified funding, trust, satisfaction; all p < .05), and most remained significantly higher at Time 3. CAB members also identified specific challenges (e.g., fully utilizing member expertise), strengths (e.g., diverse membership), and recommendations across habits. Conclusion This project’s equity-based CBPR approach used a CPPE process in conjunction with internal evaluation of cancer coalition best practices to advance CAB efforts to address cancer disparities in rural Appalachia. This approach encouraged CAB buy-in and identified key strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities that will lay the foundation for continued involvement in cancer control projects. These engagement processes may serve as a template for similar coalitions in rural, underserved areas.

Introduction: The Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program (GMaP) is a national NCI program with the goal of increasing cancer health disparities (CHD) research. GMaP Region 1 North (R1N) is one of seven GMaP Regional “hubs” based at NCI-designated cancer centers (CCs) across the country, covering the states of DE, KY, ME, MD, NH, VA, VT, WV, and the District of Columbia. The National Outreach Network (NON) is a national NCI program with the goal of conducting cancer education and outreach in underserved communities to reduce CHD. NON Community Health Educators (CHEs) are based at 38 NCI-designated CCs across the country. Six NCI-designated CCs with NON CHEs fall within the GMaP R1N coverage area. Methods: GMaP R1N staff and NON CHEs within the R1N coverage area met bimonthly to collaborate on the Screen to Save (S2S): NCI Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Outreach and Screening Initiative. The goal of S2S was to educate underserved communities on CRC and CRC screening. NON CHEs conducted the projects in diverse urban and rural communities within their CC catchment areas. Participants attended a CRC education event that provided an inflatable colon or a PowerPoint presentation and completed demographic and pre-/post-event surveys to gauge their knowledge of CRC screening. Surveys were submitted to NCI Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities program staff for review and data entry. Raw data files were returned to NON CHEs and shared with GMaP R1N staff for analysis. R1N staff provided research expertise to compare results between urban and rural S2S participants. Results: There were a total of 328 participants in S2S (n=200 urban; n=128 rural) in the GMaP R1N/NON coverage area. The median age of urban participants was 59.5 vs. 49.0 for rural participants. 95% of urban participants and 96.1% of rural participants reported having health insurance (public or private). 92.9% of urban and 88.1% of rural participants attained at least a high school diploma or GED. 76.5% of urban and 41.4% of rural participants reported ever being screened for CRC by any method. The percent increase between pre- and post-test scores for the educational intervention was 15% for urban vs. 13.3% for rural participants, with an overall percent increase in knowledge of 14.2%. Conclusions: The urban and rural participants were similar in educational and health insurance attainment levels. Urban residents reported much higher rates of previous CRC screening than rural residents, but this is likely due to the fact that more rural participants were younger than the recommended CRC initial screening age at the time (age 50). The S2S educational intervention was effective in increasing knowledge of CRC screening among both rural and urban participants, with similar increase between the two groups. Overall, this project demonstrated that two different yet complementary programs, GMaP and NON, can work together by utilizing program strengths to successfully implement an educational intervention conducted across a wide and diverse geographic area. Citation Format: Mark Cromo, Rhonda Boozer-Yeary, Melinda L. Rogers, Katelyn Schifano, Jenna Schiffelbein, Katherine L. Jones, Marcela Blinka, Julia F. Houston, Betsy Grossman, Lindsay Hauser, James Zabora, Mark B. Dignan, Tracy Onega. Integrating research and outreach to increase CRC screening knowledge in underserved communities: The Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program and National Outreach Network Screen to Save partnership [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2018 Nov 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl):Abstract nr A015.