BackgroundFor different lymph node metastasis (LNM) and distant metastasis (DM), the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of T1-2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are different. It is essential to figure out the risk factors and establish prediction models related to LNM and DM.MethodsBased on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database from 1973 to 2015, a total of 43,156 eligible T1-2 NSCLC patients were enrolled in the retrospective study. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors of LNM and DM. Risk factors were applied to construct the nomograms of LNM and DM. The predictive nomograms were discriminated against and evaluated by Concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots, respectively. Decision curve analysis (DCAs) was accepted to measure the clinical application of the nomogram. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) was performed further to detect the prognostic role of LNM and DM in NSCLC-specific death (NCSD).ResultsEight factors (age at diagnosis, race, sex, histology, T-stage, marital status, tumor size, and grade) were significant in predicting LNM and nine factors (race, sex, histology, T-stage, N-stage, marital status, tumor size, grade, and laterality) were important in predicting DM(all, P< 0.05). The calibration curves displayed that the prediction nomograms were effective and discriminative, of which the C-index were 0.723 and 0.808. The DCAs and clinical impact curves exhibited that the prediction nomograms were clinically effective.ConclusionsThe newly constructed nomograms can objectively and accurately predict LNM and DM in patients suffering from T1-2 NSCLC, which may help clinicians make individual clinical decisions before clinical management.

BackgroundDue to individualized conditions of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and distant metastasis (DM), the following therapeutic strategy and diagnosis of T1–2 esophageal cancer (ESCA) patients are varied. A prediction model for identifying risk factors for LNM, DM, and overall survival (OS) of high-risk T1–2 ESCA patients is of great significance to clinical practice.MethodsA total of 1,747 T1–2 ESCA patients screened from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database were retrospectively analyzed for their clinical data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were established to screen out risk factors for LNM and DM of T1-2 ESCA patients, while those of OS were screened out using the Cox regression analysis. The identified risk factors for LNM, DM, and OS were then subjected to the establishment of three nomograms, respectively. The accuracy of the nomograms was evaluated by depicting the calibration curve, and the predictive value and clinical utility were evaluated by depicting the clinical impact curve (CIC) and decision curve analysis (DCA), respectively.ResultsThe age, race, tumor grade, tumor size, and T-stage were significant factors for predicting LNM of T1–2 ESCA patients (p < 0.05). The age, T-stage, tumor grade, and tumor size were significant factors for predicting DM of T1–2 ESCA patients (p < 0.05). The age, race, sex, histology, primary tumor site, tumor size, N-stage, M-stage, and surgery were significant factors for predicting OS of T1–2 ESCA patients (p < 0.05). The C-indexes of the three nomograms constructed by these factors were 0.737, 0.764, and 0.740, respectively, suggesting that they were clinically effective.ConclusionsThe newly constructed nomograms can objectively and accurately predict the LNM, DM, and OS of T1–2 ESCA patients, which contribute to the individualized decision making before clinical management.