In recent years, academic health centers have made a considerable effort to encourage medical students and physicians-in-training to consider academic medicine as a career choice. For physicians, selecting a career in academic medicine may be the first hurdle, but the challenge of successfully maintaining an academic career is perhaps a more formidable task. Mentoring is a much-needed response to this challenge. But the success of traditional mentoring programs at academic institutions is often limited by, among other things, the availability of senior faculty who can serve as mentors. The authors describe the formation and organization of the Internal Medicine Research Group at Emory (IMeRGE), an innovative peer mentoring group within the Division of General Medicine at Emory University. This group, born partially out of the mentoring needs of our women and minority faculty, shared the primary goal of fostering a collaborative atmosphere among junior faculty, while simultaneously acquiring experience through advanced faculty development. The authors present our methods of garnering division support for designated time and financial resources, defining member responsibilities, developing a curriculum, providing peer support, and seeking advisors with expertise in the areas on which we wished to focus. In addition to the development of IMeRGE, the authors provide an overview of the pros and cons of traditional mentoring versus peer mentoring; discuss the challenges faced by IMeRGE and strategies for addressing these issues; and present the paradigm of IMeRGE as a template for alternative forms of academic mentorship.

Older women in a general medicine clinic had limited knowledge of sexual transmission of HIV. HIV/AIDS education specifically targeted to this subpopulation is warranted, and health professionals may have an important role in disseminating such messages.

Few of these older, high-risk women were interested in HIV testing despite the fact that more than half had risk factors for having been exposed to HIV during their life-time. Efforts to increase HIV testing interest should educate older women about HIV risk and transmission factors and promote accurate risk self-assessment.

Of 155 participants in a current relationship, 81% were sexually active; however, only 13% of these women used condoms frequently. No significant differences were found between participants who did and did not practice safer sex with respect to their age, race, employment, marital status, knowledge of condom efficacy, or perceived HIV risk. Trust in partner was independently associated with lower odds of safer sex (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.08-1.06). Personally obtaining condoms (OR 9.2, 95% CI 1.9-44.2) and dependence on partner for condoms (OR 12.3, 95% CI 3.0-50.3) were independently associated with higher odds of safer sex. CONCLUSIONS. Few older women in high HIV incidence areas practice safer sex. Relationship factors impact the risk of acquiring HIV through safer sex decisions. HIV prevention messages geared to older women should incorporate references to the role these factors can play in reducing their HIV risk.