Image functional modeling (IFM) has been introduced as a method to simultaneously synthesize imaging and mechanical data with computational models to determine the degree and location of airway constriction in asthma. Using lung imaging provided by hyperpolarized (3)He MRI, we advanced our IFM method to require matching not only to ventilation defect location but to specific ventilation throughout the lung. Imaging and mechanical data were acquired for four healthy and four asthmatic subjects pre- and postbronchial challenge. After provocation, we first identified maximum-size airways leading exclusively to ventilation defects and highly constricted them. Constriction patterns were then found for the remaining airways to match mechanical data. Ventilation images were predicted for each pattern, and visual and statistical comparisons were done with measured data. Results showed that matching of ventilation defects requires severe constriction of small airways. The mean constriction of such airways leading to the ventilation defects needed to be 70-80% rather than fully closed. Also, central airway constriction alone could not account for dysfunction seen in asthma, so small airways must be involved.

These results confirm and quantify the extent and existence of structural neural remodeling in OSA.

Acetazolamide substantially attenuates the increase in ventilation following spontaneous arousal from sleep in OSA patients. This study suggests an additional mechanism by which acetazolamide may contribute to the improvement in ventilatory instability and OSA severity. The data also provide support for reinforcing the importance of ventilatory control in OSA pathogenesis.

Esophageal pressure can be used to approximate pleural pressure and might be clinically useful, particularly in the obese e.g to guide mechanical ventilator settings in critical illness. However, mediastinal artifact (the difference between true pleural pressure and esophageal pressure) may limit acceptance of the measurement, and reproducibility of esophageal pressure measurements remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effect of body posture on esophageal pressure in a cohort of obese but healthy subjects, some of whom had multiple measurements, to address the clinical robustness of esophageal manometry. Twenty-five overweight and obese subjects (BMI>25kg/m2) and 11 control lean subjects (BMI<25kg/m2) underwent esophageal manometry with pressures measured seated and supine. Twenty overweight and obese subjects had measurements repeated after ~1-2 weeks. Anthropometric data and sitting and supine spirometry were recorded. The average end-expiratory esophageal pressures sitting and supine were greater in the overweight and obese group than the lean group (sitting −0.1±2.1 vs. −3.3±1.2cmH2O, supine 9.3±3.3 vs. 6.9±2.8cmH2O, respectively). The mean differences between repeated measurements were small (−0.3 ± 1.7cmH2O sitting and −0.1 ± 1.5cmH2O supine). Esophageal pressures correlated with a number of anthropometric and spirometric variables. In conclusion, esophageal pressures are slightly greater in overweight and obese subjects than lean subjects; but changes with position are similar in both groups. These data indicate that mediastinal weight and postural effects on esophageal pressure are within a clinically acceptable range, and suggest that esophageal manometry can be used to inform clinical decision making across wide range of body types.