The DNA in many organisms, including humans, is shown to be organized in topologically associating domains (TADs). In Drosophila, several architectural proteins are enriched at TAD borders, but it is still unclear whether these proteins play a functional role in the formation and maintenance of TADs. Here, we show that depletion of BEAF-32, Cp190, Chro, and Dref leads to changes in TAD organization and chromatin loops. Their depletion predominantly affects TAD borders located in regions moderately enriched in repressive modifications and depleted in active ones, whereas TAD borders located in euchromatin are resilient to these knockdowns. Furthermore, transcriptomic data has revealed hundreds of genes displaying differential expression in these knockdowns and showed that the majority of differentially expressed genes are located within reorganized TADs. Our work identifies a novel and functional role for architectural proteins at TAD borders in Drosophila and a link between TAD reorganization and subsequent changes in gene expression.

Background Enhancers are non-coding regions of the genome that control the activity of target genes. Recent efforts to identify active enhancers experimentally and in silico have proven effective. While these tools can predict the locations of enhancers with a high degree of accuracy, the mechanisms underpinning the activity of enhancers are often unclear. Results Using machine learning (ML) and a rule-based explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) model, we demonstrate that we can predict the location of known enhancers in Drosophila with a high degree of accuracy. Most importantly, we use the rules of the XAI model to provide insight into the underlying combinatorial histone modifications code of enhancers. In addition, we identified a large set of putative enhancers that display the same epigenetic signature as enhancers identified experimentally. These putative enhancers are enriched in nascent transcription, divergent transcription and have 3D contacts with promoters of transcribed genes. However, they display only intermediary enrichment of mediator and cohesin complexes compared to previously characterised active enhancers. We also found that 10–15% of the predicted enhancers display similar characteristics to super enhancers observed in other species. Conclusions Here, we applied an explainable AI model to predict enhancers with high accuracy. Most importantly, we identified that different combinations of epigenetic marks characterise different groups of enhancers. Finally, we discovered a large set of putative enhancers which display similar characteristics with previously characterised active enhancers.

Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that affect gene expression by binding to regulatory regions of DNA in a sequence specific manner. The binding of TFs to DNA is controlled by many factors, including the DNA sequence, concentration of TF, chromatin accessibility and co-factors. Here, we systematically investigated the binding mechanism of hundreds of TFs by analysing ChIP-seq data with our explainable statistical model, ChIPanalyser. This tool uses as inputs the DNA sequence binding motif; the capacity to distinguish between strong and weak binding sites; the concentration of TF; and chromatin accessibility. We found that approximately one third of TFs are predicted to bind the genome in a DNA accessibility independent fashion, which includes TFs that can open the chromatin, their co-factors and TFs with similar motifs. Our model predicted this to be the case when the TF binds to its strongest binding regions in the genome, and only a small number of TFs have the capacity to bind dense chromatin at their weakest binding regions, such as CTCF, USF2 and CEBPB. Our study demonstrated that the binding of hundreds of human and mouse TFs is predicted by ChIPanalyser with high accuracy and showed that many TFs can bind dense chromatin.