Background
The histological grade of bladder cancer (BCa) is an important factor associated with the treatment and prognosis. However, accurate determination of the preoperative histological grade of BCa remains a challenge.
Purpose
To investigate the diagnostic potential of synthetic MRI (SyMRI) in evaluating the histological grade of BCa.
Study Type
Prospective.
Subjects
Sixty patients (48 men and 12 women; mean age, 65 ± 11 years) with pathologically confirmed BCa (33 with high‐grade BCa and 27 with low‐grade BCa) were enrolled.
Field Strength/Sequence
Diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) acquired by a single‐shot echo‐planar sequence and SyMRI acquired by a multidynamic multiecho (MDME) sequence at 3.0 T.
Assessment
Preoperative quantitative longitudinal relaxation time (T1), transverse relaxation time (T2), proton density (PD), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of BCa were independently measured by two radiologists.
Statistical Tests
Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), independent sample t‐test, Mann–Whitney U test, Delong test, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis were used.
Results
Significant differences were found in the mean of all the T1, T2, PD, and ADC values between high‐ and low‐grade BCa. The best diagnostic performance was found for the mean ADC value with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.869, while the AUC values of the mean PD, T1, and T2 values were 0.755, 0.740, and 0.723, respectively.
Data Conclusion
SyMRI may be a potential noninvasive technique for evaluating the histological grade of BCa. However, the overall diagnostic performance of SyMRI‐derived parameters was inferior to the ADC value.
Levels of Evidence
2.
Technical Efficacy Stage
2.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.