SummaryBackgroundWhile CMV viral load (CMV-VL) is commonly used to guide preemptive therapy in the post-transplant setting, there is little data correlating viremia with clinical endpoints. We therefore investigated the association of CMV-VL with mortality in the first year after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).MethodsThis cohort study included patients who received an allogeneic HCT between 01 January 2007 and 28 February 2013, were CMV seropositive or had a seropositive donor, and underwent weekly plasma CMV monitoring by PCR through day 100 post-transplant. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of CMV-VL at different thresholds with overall by 1 year post-transplant, adjusting for the use of preemptive therapy and other factors such as neutropenia, and graft-versus-host disease. Secondary endpoints were non-relapse mortality and CMV end organ disease by 1 year post-transplant.FindingsAmong 926 patients, the cumulative overall mortality was 30·0% (95% CI 26·9–33·0) by 1 year. CMV-VL of ≥250 IU/ml was associated with increased risk of early (day 0–60 post-transplant) death (adjusted HR 18·1, 95% CI 8·8–37·4). The risk was attenuated after day 60 (adjusted HR 1·8, 95% CI 1·4–2·4). Similar associations were observed for higher CMV-VL thresholds. CMV-VL was also associated with increased risk of non-relapse mortality and demonstrated a dose-response relationship. The adjusted HR (95% CI) for CMV-VL of any positive CMV-VL below 500, 501–1000, and >1000 IU/ml were 1·4 (0·9–2·1), 2·6 (1·3–4·9), and 5·0 (3·1–8·1), respectively.InterpretationCMV viremia is associated with increased risk of overall and non-relapse mortality in the first year after HCT, independent of the use of preemptive therapy and with evidence of a postitive dose-response relationship. These data establish the suitability of viral load as a surrogate clinical endpoint for clinical trials for CMV vaccines, biologics, and drugs.FundingMerck & Co., Inc., National Institute of Health (K23-AI097234, K24HL093294, HL088021, CA78902, CA18029, HL122173)

Following its emergence in Wuhan, China, in late November or early December 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has rapidly spread globally. Genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 allows reconstruction of its transmission history, although this is contingent on sampling. We have analyzed 453 SARS-CoV-2 genomes collected between 20 February and 15 March 2020 from infected patients in Washington State, USA. We find that most SARS-CoV-2 infections sampled during this time derive from a single introduction in late January or early February 2020 which subsequently spread locally before active community surveillance was implemented.

No abstract

The role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in mediating adverse clinical outcomes in nonimmunosuppressed adults with critical illness is unknown.OBJECTIVE To determine whether ganciclovir prophylaxis reduces plasma interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels in CMV-seropositive adults who are critically ill. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial (conducted March 10, 2011-April 29, 2016 with a follow-up of 180 days (November 10, 2016) that included 160 CMV-seropositive adults with either sepsis or trauma and respiratory failure at 14 university intensive care units (ICUs) across the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSINTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg twice daily for 5 days), followed by either intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir once daily until hospital discharge (n = 84) or to receive matching placebo (n = 76). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome was change in IL-6 level from day 1 to 14. Secondary outcomes were incidence of CMV reactivation in plasma, mechanical ventilation days, incidence of secondary bacteremia or fungemia, ICU length of stay, mortality, and ventilator-free days (VFDs) at 28 days. RESULTS Among 160 randomized patients (mean age, 57 years; women, 43%), 156 received 1 or more dose(s) of treatment, and 132 (85%) completed the study. The mean between-group change in IL-6 level was not significantly different. Among secondary outcomes, CMV reactivation in plasma was significantly lower in the ganciclovir group. The ganciclovir group had more VFDs in both the intention-to-treat population and in the prespecified sepsis subgroup. There were no significant between-group differences in other secondary outcomes.