OBJECTIVE To review and critically appraise published and preprint reports of prediction models for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in patients with suspected infection, for prognosis of patients with covid-19, and for detecting people in the general population at increased risk of becoming infected with covid-19 or being admitted to hospital with the disease. DESIGNLiving systematic review and critical appraisal. DATA SOURCESPubMed and Embase through Ovid, Arxiv, medRxiv, and bioRxiv up to 7 April 2020.Cite this as: BMJ 2020;369:m1328 http://dx.

One of the goals of a pilot study is to identify unforeseen problems, such as ambiguous inclusion or exclusion criteria or misinterpretations of questionnaire items. Although sample size calculation methods for pilot studies have been proposed, none of them are directed at the goal of problem detection. In this article, we present a simple formula to calculate the sample size needed to be able to identify, with a chosen level of confidence, problems that may arise with a given probability. If a problem exists with 5% probability in a potential study participant, the problem will almost certainly be identified (with 95% confidence) in a pilot study including 59 participants.

No abstract

Our results do not confirm any meaningful association between folic acid supplement use during pregnancy and atopic diseases in the offspring. Higher ICF levels in pregnancy tended, at most, toward a small decreased risk for developing asthma.

Large differences in clinical response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are observed in depressive patients with different genotypes. Quantification of these differences is needed to decide if genetic testing prior to antidepressant treatment is useful. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the influence of polymorphisms in the serotonin transporter gene (SERTPR (or 5-HTTLPR) and STin2) on SSRI response. Studies were identified by the use of MEDLINE, EmBase and PsycINFO, references of articles, reviews and information from pharmaceutical companies. Nine studies assessing the influence of SERTPR or STin2 on treatment response were included. Outcome was expressed as the percentage of decrease in depression score (HAM-D or MADRS) or as the percentage of responders (Z50% reduction on the depression scale). Both study methodologies and study outcomes showed large heterogeneity. Weighted mean decreases in depression score for patients with the s/s, s/l and l/l genotypes were 35.4, 46.3 and 48.0% at week 4, respectively, and 53.9, 54.6 and 48.3% at week 6. Among Caucasian patients, both mean decrease in depression score and response rate were lowest in the s/s group, while among Asian patients, results were inconsistent. Weighted response rates were 36.1% for the 10/12 genotype of the STin2 polymorphism and 80.7% for the 12/12 genotype (v 2 ¼ 27.8, Po0.001) (only Asians). The available evidence points to a less favourable response to SSRI treatment among Caucasian patients with the SERTPR s/ s genotype and among (Asian) patients with the STin2 10/12 genotype. In view of the scarcity and heterogeneity of the studies, however, current information is insufficiently reliable as a basis for implementing genetic testing in the diagnostic work-up of the depressive patient.