The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical suspicion and where patients were when they received the positive result of the neonatal screening for CAH 21OHD. The present data derived from a retrospective analysis of a relatively large group of patients with classical CAH 21OHD patients nosed by newborn screening in Madrid, Spain. During the period from 1990 to 2015 of this study 46 children were diagnosed with classical 21OHD [36 with the salt-wasting (SW) form and 10 with simple virilizing (SV)]. In 38 patients, the disease had not been suspected before the neonatal screening result (30 SW and 8 SV). Thirty patients (79%) were at home without suspicion of any disease, as healthy children, 3 patients (8%) were at home pending completion of the study due to clinical suspicion of any disease (ambiguous genitalia, cryptorchidism) and 5 patients (13%) were admitted to the hospital for reasons unrelated to CAH (sepsis, jaundice, hypoglycemia). It is relevant to note that 69.4% of patients (25/36) with SW form were at home with potential risk of adrenal crisis. Six females had been incorrectly labeled as male at birth. The most frequent reason for clinical suspicion was genital ambiguity in women followed by family history of the disease. Neonatal screening provided better results than clinical suspicion. In the majority of patients with 21OHD the diagnosis by screening was anticipated to the clinical suspicion of the disease even in female patients with ambiguous genitalia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.