No abstract

Background and Aims Overhydration (OH) is an independent predictor of mortality on hemodialysis (HD). The gold standard to assess OH is BCM monitor from Fresenius®, however BCM is a hospital hold device limiting its use. New smart scales have emerged as household devices reporting daily body composition data. Objective To determine if Renpho ES-CS20M® could be useful on a 52 HD patient to estimate body composition data. Method 72 body composition assessments (BCA) during mid-week HD session were performed. Each BCA included: (1) Predialysis Renpho measurement, (2) Predialysis BCM monitor measurement, (3) Postdialysis Renpho measurement. To track the fluid balance during the HD session: (1) we recorded ultrafiltration, (2) food or fluid intake was not allowed, and (3) none of the HD patients urinated during the HD session. If any intravenous fluids were needed during the HD session, we subtracted them off from UF. Results Data from 52 HD patients were studied (age 58.8 ± 16.8 years, 56.9 % males, 14.7% diabetics), with a mean pre-HD weight of 70.0 ± 13. 4 Kg, overhydration of 1.7 ± 1.5 L and urea distribution volume of 31.7 ± 5.7 L. The mean ultrafiltration during HD session was -1.8 ± 0.9 L. Renpho estimated a Pre – HD hydration of 34.25 ± 6.02 Kg vs 33.4 ± 5.7 Kg by BCM, showing a good concordance between methods (ICC 0.788 [0.67-0.86], B -0.58, p <0.01). Renpho poorly estimated pre – HD lean tissue mass at 45.4 ± 6.9 Kg compared with 33.8 ± 8.0 Kg by BCM. Although Renpho was able to provide a moderate concordant estimation of fat tissue mass (33.8 ± 8.0 % with Renpho vs 34.7 ± 9.6%), the bias proportion was unacceptable. Post- HD hydration by Renpho was not able to reproduce the ultrafiltracion achieved during the HD session (pre-HD 34.25 ± 6.02 Kg vs post-HD 34.08 ± 6.00 Kg). Conclusion Renpho has a proportional bias estimating predialysis hydration compared with BCM monitor, but is not able to assess changes produced with ultrafiltration or other parameters of body composition (as lean or fat tissue mass). Although smart scales are unacurate to assess body composition on HD patients, they could be useful on the follow up of them changing the accuracy for frequency.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Intravitreal administration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors is the treatment of a wide variety of retinal diseases. Kidney damage caused by systemic administration is widely known. However, there is not enough information in the literature on the renal effect of these drugs after intravitreal injection. The aim of the study is to analyse the effect of intravitreal anti-VEGF on kidney function in diabetic patients. METHOD A prospective cohort study of diabetic patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD) who received intravitreal anti-VEGF from January 2018 to December 2019. Clinical and analytical parameters were analysed. The follow-up time was 24 months. RESULTS We included 45 patients (55.6% male) with a mean age of 74.4 ± 11.5 (50–91) years. Approximately 64.4% of patients had CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min]. The types of anti-VEGF used were: bevacizumab 57.8% and ranibizumab 42.2%. The average number of doses administered was 7.6 ± 4.8 (1–22). The initial eGFR was 48.7 ± 25.3 mL/min and the Alb/Cr ratio 145 (49.45) mg/g. A significant decrease in the eGFR was observed at 6, 12 and 24 months (Table 1). There was a significant increase in proteinuria at 12 and 24 months. This drop in eGFR was independent of the presence of CKD, the anti-VEGF type or the number of doses. After the admistration of the first dose, five patients (17.2%) in the CKD group required renal replacement therapy (mean time 22 ± 12 months). CONCLUSION A significant decrease in eGFR and an increase in proteinuria are observed after administration of anti-VEGF in diabetic patients. For this reason, a close monitoring of renal function is needed to establish an early diagnosis and management of possible complications.

No abstract

No abstract