No abstract

PURPOSE Sixty percent of newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) receiving frontline therapy attain a complete response (CR), yet 30%-40% of patients relapse. Relapsed or refractory AML (R/R-AML) remains a particularly adverse population necessitating improved therapeutic options. This phase Ib/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin combined with the B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor venetoclax in ND-AML and R/R-AML. MATERIALS AND METHODS The phase IB portion (PIB) enrolled patients with R/R-AML using a 3 + 3 dose escalation and de-escalation algorithm for identification of maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities. The phase II portion enrolled patients into two arms to evaluate response and time-to-event end points: phase IIA (PIIA): ND-AML and phase IIB (PIIB): R/R-AML. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients have enrolled to date (PIB, 16; PIIA, 29; PIIB, 23). Median age was 46 years (range, 20-73). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurring in ≥ 10% of patients included febrile neutropenia (50%), bacteremia (35%), pneumonia (28%), and sepsis (12%). The overall response rate for PIB, PIIA, and PIIB was 75%, 97%, and 70% with 75%, 90%, and 61%, respectively, achieving a composite CR. Measurable residual disease–negative composite CR was attained in 96% of ND-AML and 69% of R/R-AML patients. After a median follow-up of 12 months, median overall survival (OS) for both PII cohorts was not reached. Fifty-six percent of patients proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (ND-AML, 69%; R/R-AML, 46%). In R/R-AML, allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation resulted in a significant improvement in OS (median OS, NR; 1-year OS, 87%). One-year survival post-HSCT was 94% in ND-AML and 78% in R/R-AML. CONCLUSION Fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin + venetoclax represents an effective intensive treatment regimen in ND-AML and R/R-AML patients, associated with deep remissions and a high rate of transition to successful transplantation.

Despite significant improvements in the signs and symptoms of myelofibrosis (MF), and possible prolongation of patients' survival, some have disease that is refractory to ruxolitinib and many lose their response over time. Furthermore, patients with ≥3 mutations are less likely to respond to ruxolitinib. Here we describe outcomes after ruxolitinib discontinuation in MF patients enrolled in a phase 1/2 study at our center. After a median follow-up of 79 months, 86 patients had discontinued ruxolitinib (30 of whom died while on therapy). The median follow-up after ruxolitinib discontinuation for the remaining 56 patients was 32 months, with median survival after discontinuation of 14 months. Platelets <260 × 10/L at the start of therapy or <100 × 10/L at the time of discontinuation were associated with shorter survival after discontinuation. Of 62 patients with molecular data at baseline and follow-up, 22 (35%) acquired a new mutation while receiving ruxolitinib (14 [61%] in ). Patients showing clonal evolution had significantly shorter survival after discontinuation (6 vs 16 months). Transfusion dependency was the only clinical variable associated with clonal evolution. These findings underscore the need for novel therapies and suggest that clonal evolution or decreasing platelet counts while on ruxolitinib therapy may be markers of poor prognosis.

BackgroundThe durability of responses and long-term safety of pegylated interferon alpha-2a (PEG-IFN-a-2a) in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia have not been reported. Here, we present long-term efficacy and safety data from a single-center, prospective, phase 2 study, after 7 years of follow-up.MethodsPatients older than 18 years who were diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia vera per 2001 World Health Organization criteria were eligble to enroll.Responses were assessed every 3–6 months: Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The rate of leukemia transformation was compared with age- and gender-matched patients who were not treated with PEG-IFN-α-2a.FindingsPEG-IFN-α-2a induced hematologic (80%) and molecular responses (63%) in 83 patients with essential thrombocythemia (n=40) and polycythemia vera (n=43), with median durations of 66 and 53 months, respectively. Thirty-nine percent of hematologic responders and 71% of molecular responders (JAK2V617F+) have maintained some response during follow-up: 48% maintained their best molecular response, including 9 of 10 patients with a complete molecular response. The incidence of major venous-thrombotic events during the study was 1.22/person-year. Overall, 22% of patients discontinued therapy due to treatment-related toxicity. While toxicity rates decreased over time, 5 patients experienced treatment-limiting G3/4 toxicities after 60 months on therapy. Rates of transformation to MF/AML were similar between patients treated with PEG-IFN-a-2a and those from a historical control series.InterpretationPEG-IFN-α-2a can induce durable hematologic and molecular remissions in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. We suggest a starting dose of 45 mcg/week, and its combination with other drugs should be explored further in clinical trials.

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) with venetoclax is a new standard for older/unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it is unknown how HMA with venetoclax compare to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in patients who are “fit” or “unfit” for IC. We compared outcomes of older patients with newly diagnosed AML receiving 10‐day decitabine with venetoclax (DEC10‐VEN) vs IC. DEC10‐VEN consisted of daily venetoclax with decitabine 20 mg/m2 for 10 days for induction and decitabine for 5 days as consolidation. The IC cohort received regimens containing cytarabine ≥1 g/m2/d. A validated treatment‐related mortality score (TRMS) was used to classify patients at high‐risk or low‐risk for TRM with IC. Propensity scores were used to match patients to minimize bias. Median age of the DEC10‐VEN cohort (n = 85) was 72 years (range 63‐89) and 28% patients were at high‐risk of TRM with IC. The comparator IC group (n = 85) matched closely in terms of baseline characteristics. DEC10‐VEN was associated with significantly higher CR/CRi compared to IC (81% vs 52%, P < .001), and lower rate of relapse (34% vs 56%, P = .01), 30‐day mortality (1% vs 24%, P < .01), and longer overall survival (OS; 12.4 vs 4.5 months, HR = 0.48, 95%CI 0.29‐0.79, P < .01). In patients at both at high‐risk and low‐risk of TRM, DEC10‐VEN showed significantly higher CR/CRi, lower 30‐day mortality, and longer OS compared to IC. Patients at both high‐risk and low‐risk of TRM had comparable outcomes with DEC10‐VEN. In conclusion, DEC10‐VEN offers better outcomes compared to intensive chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed AML, particularly in those at high‐risk of TRM.