Frequency of unlicensed and off-label drug prescriptions showed in the study is according to the literature and may be considered high. High-alert drugs, although low in frequency, can present risks due to the harmful effects they can produce in patients. Thus, the highlighted drugs in this study constitute a constant concern in hospitals.
Objetivo: analisar o uso da hipodermóclise em pacientes com câncer em cuidados paliativos. Método: estudo transversal descritivo, com objetivo de descrever a experiência da utilização da hipodermóclise em pacientes sob cuidados paliativos, realizado em um hospital universitário do sul do Brasil. A amostra, por conveniência, abrangeu 80 pacientes que internaram em cuidados paliativos entre março/2014 e março/2015. A coleta de dados ocorreu mediante instrumento específico e a análise por estatística descritiva. Resultados: as neoplasias predominantes foram pâncreas 9(11,3%), intestino 8(10%), pulmão 8(10%) e gástrica 8(10%). Entre as indicações para hipodermóclise prevaleceram analgesia 63(78,8%), rede venosa precária 51(63,8%) e intolerância oral 38(47,5%). Dos 21 fármacos prescritos e administrados destacam-se morfina 76(95,0%), metoclopramida 49(61,3%), dipirona 39(48,8%), ondansetrona 29(36,3%) e dexametasona 12(15,0%). Ocorreram 105 punções e nenhuma complicação sistêmica. Considerações finais: a hipodermóclise mostrou-se uma terapêutica medicamentosa eficaz, segura e menos invasiva na prática clínica paliativista.
IntroductionThe expected therapeutic response may be affected by the presence of drug interactions. With the high number of reports on new drug interactions, it has been difficult for health professionals to keep constantly updated. For this reason, computer systems have helped identify such interactions.ObjectivesTo verify the rate and profile of drug interactions in medical prescriptions to hospitalized pediatric patients.MethodsA descriptive study investigated prescriptions to hospitalized pediatric patients. The study included patients between 0 and 12 years old, containing 4 or more drugs in their prescriptions. The analysis of interaction and incompatibility possibilities in prescribed drugs used Micromedex / Drug-Reax® program.ResultsFrom 2005 to 2006, 3,170 patients were investigated, and 11,181 prescriptions were analyzed, a mean value of 3.5 prescriptions/patient. In total, 6,857 drug interactions were found, which corresponds to 1.9 interaction/prescription. Among them, relevance to ampicillin and gentamicin, found in 220 (3.2%) prescriptions. In total, 2,411 drug incompatibilities in via y were found, a mean value of 0.5/prescription, with emphasis on vancomycin and cefepime, found in 243 (10.0%) prescriptions.ConclusionThe presence of drug interactions is a permanent risk in hospitals. This way, the utilization of computer programs, pharmacotherapy monitoring of patients and the pharmacist presence in the multidisciplinary team are some manners of contributing to hospitalized patients’ treatment.
Objective:To identify and describe actual or potential medication errors related to drug information inquiries made by staff members of a teaching hospital to a Drug Information Centre from January 2012 to December 2013.Methods:Data were collected from the records of inquiries made by health care professionals to the Drug Information Centre throughout this period.Results:During the study period, the Drug Information Centre received 3,500 inquiries. Of these, 114 inquiries had medication errors. Most errors were related to prescribing, preparation, and administration and were classified according to severity as category B (57%) (potential errors) and categories C (26.3%) and D (15.8%) (actual errors that did not result in harm to the patient). Error causes included overdose (13.2%), wrong route of administration (11.4%), inadequate drug storage (11.4%), and wrong dosage form (8.8%). The drugs most frequently involved in errors were vitamin K (4.4%), vancomycin (3.5%), and meropenem (3.5%).Conclusion:In this study, it was not possible to measure the reduction in error rate involving medication use because of the lack of previous data on this process in the institution. However, our findings indicate that the Drug Information Centre may be used as a strategy to seek improvements in processes involving medication use.
Background Randomised clinical trials (RCT) are considered a gold standard generating efficacy and safety data supporting drug approval. However, real world data (RWD) reflecting health care delivery is becoming increasingly important. RWD on patient profiles and patterns of care in MBC are scarce in developing countries. As an example, observational studies suggest that despite guideline recommendations clearly indicating ET for hormone receptor positive MBC, a considerable proportion of patients in clinical practice begin chemotherapy in early lines of therapy. This pragmatic information addresses the uptake and applicability of the RCT results and should be able to help informing health care planning complementing RCT generated data. The objective of this study is to describe patient characteristics and evaluate actual physician-reported treatments for MBC in Brazil. Methods This analysis addresses the first 362 patients included in LACOG-0312, a retrospective study planning to recruit over 700 patients (cut-off date April 30th 2016) with recurrent locally advanced or MBC diagnosed in 2012 in 18 institutions across Brazil. Patient characteristics, type of health insurance coverage, treatment and survival outcome were analysed. Results Median age at BC diagnosis was 53 years and 37% were premenopausal. Regarding the educational level, 63.2% had completed elementary (primary) schooling, 75.7% were covered by the public health system while 24.3% had some form of private coverage. 70% of patients had hormone receptor positive (HR+) and 18% had HER2 positive tumors. Median disease free survival time from surgery was 29 months. Interestingly, 30% of patients underwent a biopsy of a metastatic site. Of the 362 patients, 349 (96.9%) received some form of palliative systemic therapy. Median time from diagnosis of metastatic disease to first-line therapy initiation was 46 days but a significant difference was noted between patients with public versus private health insurance (50 vs. 33 days p=0.012). Half of the patients received at least 3 lines of therapy (chemo or endocrine) to a maximum of 9 lines. In patients with HR+ tumors, endocrine therapy was administered in 47% in first, 65% in second and 61% in third-line, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of metastatic disease was 34 months (CI 95%: 25.7-44.3) and no differences in OS were observed between patients with public or private coverage (34 months vs. 35 months p=0.808). Causes of death were cancer in 85.2% of patients and treatment toxicity in 3.6%. Conclusion Our study included a population with predominantly low educational level and mostly public health insurance. This likely corresponds to the majority of cases and reflects cancer care patterns in Brazil and many developing countries. A considerable proportion of patients were premenopausal at MBC diagnosis. More than half of HR+ patients received at least 3 lines of endocrine therapy although 54% of them had chemotherapy as the first systemic treatment. Patients from the public health system experienced a delay in starting first-line therapy but this didn't seem to jeopardize cancer outcomes in this setting. Citation Format: Barrios CH, Uema D, Cronenberger E, Lima V, Bines J, de Sant'ana RO, Batista ML, Dybal V, Liedke P, Beato C, Nerón YV, Giacomazzi J, dos Santos L, Ismael G, Azambuja A, Andrade D, Rosa DD, Borges G, Mano M, Martinez-Mesa J, Zaffaroni F, Werutsky G. Real World data and patterns of care of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in Brazil: First results of LACOG 0312 retrospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-16-04.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.