In this validation study, the BCR at admission provided a limited value to predict severe forms of D+HUS. What is Known: • BCR at admission has been proposed as an accurate predictor of complicated clinical course in children with D+HUS. What is New: • In a larger series of children with D+HUS, we were unable to confirm the usefulness of the admission BCR to early identify those at risk of complicated forms of the disease. • Further research is warranted to improve the optimal detection of these high-risk patients.
Introduction. Renal involvement among pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 ranges between 1.2% and 44%. Given the limited information available locally, the primary objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of renal involvement in our setting. Population and methods. Cross-sectional study conducted in 13 Argentine sites between March and December 2020. Patients aged 1 month to 18 years hospitalized due to COVID-19 and with at least one measurement of serum creatinine and/or a urinalysis were included. Those with a known kidney disease were excluded. Renal involvement was defined as the presence of acute kidney injury (AKI), proteinuria, hematuria, leukocyturia and/or arterial hypertension (HTN). Results. Among 528 eligible medical records, 423 patients were included (55.0% were males; median age: 5.3 years). The clinical presentation was asymptomatic in 31%; mild, in 39.7%; moderate, in 23.9%; severe, in 1.2%; critical, in 0.7%; and 3.5% had multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Two patients (0.47%) died. The prevalence of renal involvement was 10.8% (95% confidence interval: 8.2-14.2); it was described as leukocyturia (16.9%), proteinuria (16.0%), hematuria (13.2%), HTN (3.7%), and AKI (2.3%). No patient required dialysis. Renal involvement was associated with severe forms of disease (p < 0.0001). Conclusion. The prevalence of renal involvement among pediatric patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in 13 Argentine sites was 10.8%; severe forms of disease prevailed.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate practice patterns during prodromal phase of hemolytic uremic syndrome related to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC-HUS).Methods: Trajectories of children from first symptoms until STEC-HUS admitted consecutively at our center (period 2000-2017) were retrospectively reviewed. Early recommended practices include identification of STEC infections, antibiotics and antiperistaltic avoidance, and administration of anticipatory intravenous fluids; therefore, implementation and changes over time (before and after 2011) of such interventions were assessed. In addition, early management was correlated with acute disease outcomes.Results: Of 172 patients, 98 (57%) had early consults, 75 of them visit the pediatric emergency department. Those seen with watery diarrhea (n = 74) were managed as outpatients, whereas 27 of the 45 assisted with bloody diarrhea were hospitalized for diagnosis other than STEC-HUS. Stool cultures were performed in 13.4% (23/172), 18% (31/172) received antibiotics, and 12.8% (22/172) received endovenous fluids; none received antiperistaltic agents. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli infection was proven in 4% (7/172) before HUS. Rate of cultured patients and treated with intravenous fluids remained unchanged over time (P = 0.13 and P = 0.48, respectively), whereas antibiotic prescription decreased from 42.8% to 16.6% (P = 0.005). Main acute outcomes (need for dialysis, pancreatic compromise, central nervous system involvement, and death) were similar (P > 0.05) regardless of whether they received antibiotics or intravenous fluids.Conclusions: During the diarrheal phase, 57% of patients consulted; three-quarters of them consulted to the pediatric emergency department. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli detection was poor, antibiotic use remained high, and anticipatory volume expansion was underused. These findings outline the critical need to improve the early management of STEC-HUS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.