BackgroundThere is no consensus about the prognostic role of HER2 expression and that of other members of the EGFR family in gastric cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the EGFR family in gastric cancer.MethodsThis retrospective study included 201 patients with gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma stages 0–IV (AJCC 6th edition) who underwent primary tumor resection. Tissues from primary tumors were analyzed by tissue microarray technology and immunohistochemistry. Correlations between receptor expression and clinicopathological characteristics were performed according to the chi-square test. Survival analysis was calculated according to the Weibull model with a mixture model incorporating long-term survivors. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed by a regression model incorporating long-term survivors with the Weibull distribution.ResultsMembrane expression of HER1, HER2, and HER4 were 9, 17, and 15 %, respectively. No membrane expression of HER3 was observed. Cytoplasmic expression of HER1, HER3, and HER4 were 45, 62, and 24 %, respectively. HER2 and HER3 expression were correlated (p < 0.001) and associated with intestinal-type histology (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and advanced age (p = 0.011 and p = 0.008, respectively). According to a regression model adjusted for age, surgical radicality, surgical modality, Laurén histology, adjuvant therapy, TNM stage, and receptor expressions, only TNM stage showed prognostic influence.ConclusionsAccording to analysis by a parametric model, the EGFR family did not have prognostic influence in the gastric cancer population studied. The data presented showed a correlation between HER2 and HER3 expression, which might suggest a potential role for HER2–HER3 heterodimerization inhibitors.

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the expression levels of selected integrin genes and proteins and cell differentiation, TNM stage, histological type and other variables potentially associated with the progression and dissemination of colorectal carcinoma (CRC).MethodsA total of 114 patients (63 men and 51 women) were treated for CRC between 2006 and 2009, including 25 (21.9%) TNM I, 39 (34.2%) TNM II, 34 (29.8%) TNM III, and 16 (14.1%) TNM IV. Regarding grade, 91 (79.8%) were grade II, 14 (12.2%) were grade III and nine (7.8%) were grade I. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and tissue microarray (TMA) methods were used to examine the expression levels of the genes ITGAV, ITGA3, ITGA5, ITGB5, and ITGA6, and their proteins, respectively.ResultsIn relation to TNM staging, ITGB5 and ITGA3 were over-expressed in stages III versus I. These results were confirmed by TMA analysis. In terms of age, ITGA5 was under-expressed according to RT-PCR, but over-expressed by TMA in patients over 60 years, while ITGA5 gene and protein levels were increased in mucinous carcinomas. In addition ITGAV gene and protein levels were elevated in tumors with neural invasion, and ITGA6 gene and protein were over-expressed in cases with venous invasion. All these results were significant at P < 0.05.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that over-expression of some integrins is associated with TNM III stage, increased risk of vascular and neural invasion, and mucinous histology in patients with CRC.

13 Background: Docetaxel/prednisone is standard first-line chemotherapy for mCRPC. Aflibercept (known as ziv-aflibercept in the US) is a recombinant human fusion protein that binds VEGF-A, VEGF-B and Placental Growth Factor (PlGF), thereby inhibiting angiogenesis. Methods: VENICE was a double-blind, randomized phase III study with overall survival (OS) as primary endpoint. Men with mCRPC, ECOG PS 0-2, adequate organ function and no prior cytotoxic therapy were treated with docetaxel (75 mg/m² iv q3w) and oral prednisone (5mg bid) and randomized double blind 1:1 to receive aflibercept (A) 6 mg/kg or placebo (Pbo), IV every 3 weeks. Pts were stratified by ECOG PS (0-1 vs 2). For final OS analysis, 873 deaths were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.8 with 90% power (overall 2-sided α = 0.05). Results: From Aug 2007 to Feb 2010, 1224 patients (median age 68 yr, PS 0-1 96%) were randomized. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms. Median number of cycles was 8 (A) and 9 (Pbo). Median relative dose intensity was >0.93 for A, Pbo and docetaxel. At final cut-off, median follow-up was 35.4 mos and 873 pts had died. Results for primary and key secondary endpoints with confidence intervals are in the table. Higher incidence of all grade hypertension, stomatitis, appetite disorders, diarrhea, dehydration, epistaxis, dysphonia, cough, headache and infections was observed in the aflibercept arm. Conclusions: Aflibercept in combination with docetaxel/prednisone given as first line chemotherapy for mCRPC did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in OS and added toxicity. (NCT00519285 sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) Clinical trial information: NCT00519285. [Table: see text]

No abstract