Subjective state constructs are defined within the traditional domains of affect, motivation, and cognition. Currently, there is no overarching state model that interrelates constructs within the different domains. This article reports 3 studies that provide converging evidence for 3 fundamental state dimensions labeled task engagement, distress, and worry that integrate constructs across the traditional domains. Study 1 differentiated the state dimensions by factor analysis of the scales of the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (G. Matthews et al., 1999). Study 2 showed differential state response to performance of tasks making different cognitive demands. Study 3 showed that states are correlated with differing patterns of appraisal and coping. The 3 stress state dimensions provide a general descriptive framework consistent with transactional accounts of stress and performance.
A study of group differences in susceptibility to stress during simulated driving is reported. 74 drivers participated, with approximately equal numbers of younger (18-25) and older (55-78) drivers, and of men and women. Stress was manipulated by exposing half the sample to a failure experience; frequent, uncontrollable skids. Following the stress manipulation, drivers' hazard perception, speed and vehicle control were assessed. Subjective state before and after the drive was assessed by questionnaire. It was hypothesized that older and female drivers might show greater subjective distress and performance impairment in the stress condition. Results showed that age was a stronger influence on performance than either gender or stress. Older drivers showed impairments in hazard detection and vehicle control, but appeared to compensate through slower speed. Older drivers and women showed higher levels of distress throughout the study, but these groups did not show any differential sensitivity to the stress manipulation. It is concluded that driver stress as a safety problem largely depends on individual differences, although group differences may be evident in other circumstances.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.