UVB-induced lesions in mammalian cellular DNA can, through the process of mutagenesis, lead to carcinogenesis. However, eukaryotic cells have evolved complex mechanisms of genomic surveillance and DNA damage repair to counteract the effects of UVB radiation. We show that following UVB DNA damage, there is an overall inhibition of protein synthesis and translational reprogramming. This reprogramming allows selective synthesis of DDR proteins, such as ERCC1, ERCC5, DDB1, XPA, XPD, and OGG1 and relies on upstream ORFs in the 59 untranslated region of these mRNAs. Experiments with DNA-PKcs-deficient cell lines and a specific DNA-PKcs inhibitor demonstrate that both the general repression of mRNA translation and the preferential translation of specific mRNAs depend on DNA-PKcs activity, and therefore our data establish a link between a key DNA damage signaling component and protein synthesis.[Keywords: DNA damage; translation; upstream ORF] Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.

The poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib is FDA approved for the treatment of BRCA-mutated breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancers. Olaparib inhibits PARP1/2 enzymatic activity and traps PARP1 on DNA at single-strand breaks, leading to replication-induced DNA damage that requires BRCA1/2-dependent homologous recombination repair. Moreover, DNA damage response pathways mediated by the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) kinases are hypothesised to be important survival pathways in response to PARP-inhibitor treatment. Here, we show that olaparib combines synergistically with the ATR-inhibitor AZD6738 (ceralasertib), in vitro, leading to selective cell death in ATM-deficient cells. We observe that 24 h olaparib treatment causes cells to accumulate in G2-M of the cell cycle, however, co-administration with AZD6738 releases the olaparib-treated cells from G2 arrest. Selectively in ATM-knockout cells, we show that combined olaparib/AZD6738 treatment induces more chromosomal aberrations and achieves this at lower concentrations and earlier treatment time-points than either monotherapy. Furthermore, single-agent olaparib efficacy in vitro requires PARP inhibition throughout multiple rounds of replication. Here, we demonstrate in several ATM-deficient cell lines that the olaparib and AZD6738 combination induces cell death within 1-2 cell divisions, suggesting that combined treatment could circumvent the need for prolonged drug exposure. Finally, we demonstrate in vivo combination activity of olaparib and AZD6738 in xenograft and PDX mouse models with complete ATM loss. Collectively, these data provide a mechanistic understanding of combined PARP and ATR inhibition in ATM-deficient models, and support the clinical development of AZD6738 in combination with olaparib.

DNA damage checkpoint kinases ATR and WEE1 are among key regulators of DNA damage response pathways protecting cells from replication stress, a hallmark of cancer that has potential to be exploited for therapeutic use. ATR and WEE1 inhibitors are in early clinical trials and success will require greater understanding of both their mechanism of action and biomarkers for patient selection. Here, we report selective antitumor activity of ATR and WEE1 inhibitors in a subset of non-germinal center B-cell (GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines, characterized by high MYC protein expression and CDKN2A/B deletion. Activity correlated with the induction of replication stress, indicated by increased origin firing and retardation of replication fork progression. However, ATR and WEE1 inhibitors caused different amounts of DNA damage and cell death in distinct phases of the cell cycle, underlying the increased potency observed with WEE1 inhibition. ATR inhibition caused DNA damage to manifest as 53BP1 nuclear bodies in daughter G 1 cells leading to G 1 arrest, whereas WEE1 inhibition caused DNA damage and arrest in S phase, leading to earlier onset apoptosis. In vivo xenograft DLBCL models confirmed differences in single-agent antitumor activity, but also showed potential for effective ATR inhibitor combinations. Importantly, insights into the different inhibitor mechanisms may guide differentiated clinical development strategies aimed at exploiting specific vulnerabilities of tumor cells while maximizing therapeutic index. Our data therefore highlight clinical development opportunities for both ATR and WEE1 inhibitors in non-GCB DLBCL subtypes that represent an area of unmet clinical need.Significance: ATR and WEE1 inhibitors demonstrate effective antitumor activity in preclinical models of DLBCL associated with replication stress, but new mechanistic insights and biomarkers of response support a differentiated clinical development strategy.

AZD6738 (ceralasertib) is a potent and selective orally bioavailable inhibitor of ataxia telangiectasia and rad3-related (ATR) kinase. ATR is activated in response to stalled DNA replication forks to promote G2/M-cell cycle checkpoints and fork restart. Here, we found AZD6738 modulated CHK1 phosphorylation and induced ATM-dependent signaling (pRAD50) and the DNA damage marker γH2AX. AZD6738 inhibited breakinduced replication (BIR) and homologous recombination repair (HRR). In vitro sensitivity to AZD6738 was elevated in, but not exclusive to, cells with defects in the ATM-pathway or that harbor putative drivers of replication stress such as CCNE1amplification. This translated to in vivo anti-tumor activity, with tumor control requiring continuous dosing and free plasma exposures which correlated with induction of pCHK1, pRAD50, and γH2AX. AZD6738 showed combinatorial efficacy with agents associated with replication fork stalling and collapse such as carboplatin and irinotecan and the PARP inhibitor olaparib. These combinations required optimisation of dose and schedules in vivo and showed superior anti-tumor activity at lower doses compared to that required for monotherapy. Tumor regressions required at least 2 days of daily dosing of AZD6738 concurrent with carboplatin, while twicedaily dosing was required following irinotecan. In a BRCA2-mutant patient-derived triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) xenograft model, complete tumor regression was achieved with 3-5 days of daily AZD6738 per week concurrent with olaparib. Increasing olaparib dosage or AZD6738 dosing to twice-daily allowed complete tumor regression even in a BRCA wild-type TNBC xenograft model. These preclinical data provide rationale for clinical evaluation of AZD6738 as a monotherapy or combinatorial agent.

Background AZD0156 and AZD6738 are potent and selective inhibitors of ataxia-telangiectasia-kinase (ATM) and ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR), respectively, important sensors/signallers of DNA damage. Methods We used multiplexed targeted-mass-spectrometry to select pRAD50(Ser635) as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for AZD0156-mediated ATM inhibition from a panel of 45 peptides, then developed and tested a clinically applicable immunohistochemistry assay for pRAD50(Ser635) detection in FFPE tissue. Results We found moderate pRAD50 baseline levels across cancer indications. pRAD50 was detectable in 100% gastric cancers ( n = 23), 99% colorectal cancers ( n = 102), 95% triple-negative-breast cancers (TNBC) ( n = 40) and 87.5% glioblastoma-multiformes ( n = 16). We demonstrated AZD0156 target inhibition in TNBC patient-derived xenograft models; where AZD0156 monotherapy or post olaparib treatment, resulted in a 34–72% reduction in pRAD50. Similar inhibition of pRAD50 (68%) was observed following ATM inhibitor treatment post irinotecan in a colorectal cancer xenograft model. ATR inhibition, using AZD6738, increased pRAD50 in the ATM-proficient models whilst in ATM-deficient models the opposite was observed, suggesting pRAD50 pharmacodynamics post ATR inhibition may be ATM-dependent and could be useful to determine ATM functionality in patients treated with ATR inhibitors. Conclusion Together these data support clinical utilisation of pRAD50 as a biomarker of AZD0156 and AZD6738 pharmacology to elucidate clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships, thereby informing recommended Phase 2 dose/schedule.