Automatic Non-rigid Histological Image Registration (ANHIR) challenge was organized to compare the performance of image registration algorithms on several kinds of microscopy histology images in a fair and independent manner. We have assembled 8 datasets, containing 355 images with 18 different stains, resulting in 481 image pairs to be registered. Registration accuracy was evaluated using manually placed landmarks. In total, 256 teams registered for the challenge, 10 submitted the results, and 6 participated in the workshop. Here, we present the results of 7 wellperforming methods from the challenge together with 6 well-known existing methods. The best methods used coarse but robust initial alignment, followed by non-rigid registration, used multiresolution, and were carefully tuned for the data at hand. They outperformed off-the-shelf methods, mostly by being more robust. The best methods could successfully register over 98% of all landmarks and their mean landmark registration accuracy (TRE) was 0.44% of the image diagonal. The challenge remains open to submissions and all images are available for download.

Purpose The availability of radiographic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for the Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project (Ivy GAP) has opened up opportunities for development of radiomic markers for prognostic/predictive applications in glioblastoma (GBM). In this work, we address two critical challenges with regard to developing robust radiomic approaches: (a) the lack of availability of reliable segmentation labels for glioblastoma tumor sub‐compartments (i.e., enhancing tumor, non‐enhancing tumor core, peritumoral edematous/infiltrated tissue) and (b) identifying “reproducible” radiomic features that are robust to segmentation variability across readers/sites. Acquisition and validation methods From TCIA’s Ivy GAP cohort, we obtained a paired set (n = 31) of expert annotations approved by two board‐certified neuroradiologists at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) and at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU). For these studies, we performed a reproducibility study that assessed the variability in (a) segmentation labels and (b) radiomic features, between these paired annotations. The radiomic variability was assessed on a comprehensive panel of 11 700 radiomic features including intensity, volumetric, morphologic, histogram‐based, and textural parameters, extracted for each of the paired sets of annotations. Our results demonstrated (a) a high level of inter‐rater agreement (median value of DICE ≥0.8 for all sub‐compartments), and (b) ≈24% of the extracted radiomic features being highly correlated (based on Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient) to annotation variations. These robust features largely belonged to morphology (describing shape characteristics), intensity (capturing intensity profile statistics), and COLLAGE (capturing heterogeneity in gradient orientations) feature families. Data format and usage notes We make publicly available on TCIA’s Analysis Results Directory (https://doi.org/10.7937/9j41‐7d44), the complete set of (a) multi‐institutional expert annotations for the tumor sub‐compartments, (b) 11 700 radiomic features, and (c) the associated reproducibility meta‐analysis. Potential applications The annotations and the associated meta‐data for Ivy GAP are released with the purpose of enabling researchers toward developing image‐based biomarkers for prognostic/predictive applications in GBM.

Histopathologic assessment routinely provides rich microscopic information about tissue structure and disease process. However, the sections used are very thin, and essentially capture only 2D representations of a certain tissue sample. Accurate and robust alignment of sequentially cut 2D slices should contribute to more comprehensive assessment accounting for surrounding 3D information. Towards this end, we here propose a two-step diffeomorphic registration approach that aligns differently stained histology slides to each other, starting with an initial affine step followed by estimating a deformation field. It was quantitatively evaluated on ample (n = 481) and diverse data from the automatic non-rigid histological image registration challenge, where it was awarded the second rank. The obtained results demonstrate the ability of the proposed approach to robustly (average robustness = 0.9898) and accurately (average relative target registration error = 0.2%) align differently stained histology slices of various anatomical sites while maintaining reasonable computational efficiency (<1 min per registration). The method was developed by adapting a general-purpose registration algorithm designed for 3D radiographic scans and achieved consistently accurate results for aligning high-resolution 2D histologic images. Accurate alignment of histologic images can contribute to a better understanding of the spatial arrangement and growth patterns of cells, vessels, matrix, nerves, and immune cell interactions.

No abstract

No abstract