The most significant problem of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) fingernail dosimetry is the presence of two signals of non-radiation origin that overlap the radiation-induced signal (RIS), making it almost impossible to perform dose measurements below 5 Gy. Historically, these two non-radiation components were named mechanically induced signal (MIS) and background signal (BKS). In order to investigate them in detail, three different methods of MIS and BKS mutual isolation have been developed and implemented. After applying these methods, it is shown here that fingernail tissue, after cut, can be modeled as a deformed sponge, where the MIS and BKS are associated with the stress from elastic and plastic deformations, respectively. A sponge has a unique mechanism of mechanical stress absorption, which is necessary for fingernails in order to perform its everyday function of protecting the fingertips from hits and trauma. Like a sponge, fingernails are also known to be an effective water absorber. When a sponge is saturated with water, it tends to restore to its original shape, and when it loses water, it becomes deformed again. The same happens to fingernail tissue. It is proposed that the MIS and BKS signals of mechanical origin be named MIS1 and MIS2 for MISs 1 and 2, respectively. Our suggested interpretation of the mechanical deformation in fingernails gives also a way to distinguish between the MIS and RIS. The results obtained show that the MIS in irradiated fingernails can be almost completely eliminated without a significant change to the RIS by soaking the sample for 10 min in water. The proposed method to measure porosity (the fraction of void space in spongy material) of the fingernails gave values of 0.46-0.48 for three of the studied samples. Existing results of fingernail dosimetry have been obtained on mechanically stressed samples and are not related to the "real" in vivo dosimetric properties of fingernails. A preliminary study of these properties of pre-soaked (unstressed) fingernails has demonstrated their significant difference from fingernails stressed by cut. They show a higher stability signal, a less intensive non-radiation component, and a nonlinear dose dependence. The findings in this study set the stage for understanding fingernail EPR dosimetry and doing in vivo measurements in the future.
This paper presents the results of the 4th International Comparison of in vitro electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry with tooth enamel, where the performance parameters of tooth enamel dosimetry methods were compared among sixteen laboratories from all over the world. The participating laboratories were asked to determine a calibration curve with a set of tooth enamel powder samples provided by the organizers. Nine molar teeth extracted following medical indication from German donors and collected between 1997 and 2007 were prepared and irradiated at the Helmholtz Zentrum München. Five out of six samples were irradiated at 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 Gy air kerma; and one unirradiated sample was kept as control. The doses delivered to the individual samples were unknown to the participants, who were asked to measure each sample nine times, and to report the EPR signal response, the mass of aliquots measured, and the parameters of EPR signal acquisition and signal evaluation. Critical dose and detection limit were calculated by the organizers on the basis of the calibration-curve parameters obtained at every laboratory. For calibration curves obtained by measuring every calibration sample three times, the mean value of the detection limit was 205 mGy, ranging from 56 to 649 mGy. The participants were also invited to provide the signal response and the nominal dose of their current dose calibration curve (wherever available), the critical dose and detection limit of which were also calculated by the organizers..
Fiber-optic-coupled radioluminescent (FOC) dosimeters are members of a new family of dosimeters that are finding increased clinical applications. This study provides the first characterization of a Cu doped quartz FOC dosimeter at diagnostic energies, specifically across the range of x-ray energies and intensities used in mammographies. We characterize the calibration factors, linearity, angular dependence, and reproducibility of the FOC dosimeters. The sensitive element of each dosimeter was coupled to a photon counting photomultiplier module via 1 m long optical fibers. A computer controlled interface permitted real-time monitoring of the dosimeter output and rapid data acquisition. The axial-angular responses for all dosimeter models show nearly uniform response without any marked decrease in sensitivity. However, the normal-to-axial angular response showed a marked decrease in sensitivity of about 0 degrees C and 180 degrees C. In most clinical applications, appropriate dosimeter positioning can minimize the contributions of the varying normal-to-axial response. The FOC dosimeters having the greatest sensitive length provided the greatest sensitivity, with greatest to lowest sensitivity observed for 4.0, 1.9, 1.6, and 1.1 mm length sensitive elements. The average sensitivity of the dosimeters varies linearly with sensitive volume (R2=95%) and as a function of tube potential and target/filter combinations, generally exhibiting an increased sensitivity for higher energies. The dosimeter sensitivity as a function of tube potential had an average increase of 4.72 +/- 2.04% for dosimeter models and three target-filter combinations tested (Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, and Rh/Rh) over a range of 25-31 kVp. All dosimeter models exhibited a linear response (R2 > or = 0.997) to exposure for all target-filter combinations, tube potentials, and tube current-time product stations evaluated and demonstrated reproducibility within 2%. All of the dosimeters examined in this study provided a response adequate for the accurate measurement of doses in clinical mammography applications.
A summary of recent developments in fingernail EPR dosimetry is presented in this paper. Until 2007, there had been a very limited number of studies of radiation-induced signals in fingernails. Although these studies showed some promising results, they were not complete with regard to the nature of non-radiation signals and the variability of dose dependence in fingernails. Recent study has shown that the two non-radiation components of the EPR spectrum of fingernails are originated from mechanical stress induced in the samples at their cut. The mechanical properties of fingernails were found to be very similar to those of a sponge; therefore, an effective way to eliminate their mechanical deformation is by soaking them in water. Stress caused by deformation can also significantly modify the dose response and radiation sensitivity. Consequently, it is critically important to take into account the mechanical stress in fingernail samples under EPR dose measurements. Obtained results have allowed formulating a prototype of a protocol for dose measurements in human fingernails.
The results of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements in irradiated fingernails are presented. In total, 83 samples of different fingernails were studied. Five different groups of samples were selected based on the collection time of fingernail samples, their level of mechanical stress, and the number and size of clippings: (1) recently (<24 h) cut, irradiated and measured with EPR without any treatment of samples, and with rigorous control of size and number of clippings (stressed-fresh, controlled); (2) recently (<24 h) cut, irradiated and measured with EPR after application of a special treatment (10 min of water soaking, 5 min of drying time) to reduce the mechanical stress caused by cutting the samples, and with rigorous control of size and number of clippings (unstressed-fresh, controlled); (3) previously (>24 h) cut, stored at room temperature, additionally cut into small pieces immediately prior to study, irradiated and measured with EPR without any treatment of samples, and with rigorous control of size and number of clippings (stressed-old, controlled); (4) previously (>24 h) cut, stored at room temperature, additionally cut into small pieces immediately prior to the study, irradiated and measured with EPR after application of a special treatment to reduce mechanical stress caused by cut, and with rigorous control of size and number of clippings (unstressed-old, controlled); and (5) recently (<24 h) cut, irradiated and measured with EPR after application of a special treatment to reduce the mechanical stress caused by cut, and without rigorous control of size and number of clippings (unstressed-fresh, uncontrolled). Except for the fifth selected group, variability of the dose dependence inside all groups was found to be not statistically significant, although the variability among the different groups was significant. Comparison of the mean dose dependences obtained for each group allowed selection of key factors responsible for radiation sensitivity (dose response per unit of mass and dose) and the shape of dose dependence in fingernails. The major factor responsible for radiation sensitivity of fingernails was identified as their water content, which can affect radiation sensitivity up to 35%. The major factor responsible for the shape of the radiation sensitivity was identified as the mechanical stress. At a significant level of mechanical stress, the shape of the dose dependence is linear in the studied dose range (<20 Gy), and in lesser-stressed samples it is of an exponential growth including saturation, which depends on the degree of mechanical stress. In view of the findings, recommendations are discussed and presented for the appropriate protocol for EPR dose measurements in fingernails.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.