The persistence of the broad-spectrum antiparasitic activity of endectocide compounds relies on their disposition kinetics and pattern of plasma/tissues exchange in the host. This study evaluates the comparative plasma disposition kinetics of ivermectin (IVM), moxidectin (MXD) and doramectin (DRM) in cattle treated with commercially available injectable formulations. Twelve (12) parasite-free male Hereford calves (180-210 kg) grazing on pasture were allocated into three groups of four animals each. Animals in each group received either IVM (Ivomec 1%, MSD AGVET, Rahway, NJ, USA), MXD (Cydectin 1%. American Cyanamid, Wayne, NJ, USA) or DRM (Dectomax 1%, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA) by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 200 micrograms/kg. Jugular blood samples were collected from 1 h up to 80 days post-treatment, and plasma extracted, derivatized and analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using fluorescence detection. The parent molecules were detected in plasma between 1 h and either 70 (DRM) or 80 (IVM and MXD) days post-treatment. The absorption of MXD from the site of injection was significantly faster (absorption half-life (t1/2ab) = 1.32 h) than those of IVM (t1/2ab = 39.2 h) and DRM (t1/2ab = 56.4 h). MXD peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was reached significantly earlier (8.00 h) compared to those of IVM and DRM (4-6 days post-treatment). There were no differences on Cmax values: the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was higher for IVM (459 ng.d/mL) and DRM (627 ng.d/mL) compared to that of MXD (217 ng.d/mL). The mean plasma residence time was longer for MXD (14.6 d) compared to IVM (7.35 d) and DRM (9.09 d). Unidentified metabolites were detected in plasma: they accounted for 5.75% (DRM), 8.50% (IVM) and 13.8% (MXD) of the total amount of their respective parent drugs recovered in plasma. The comparative plasma disposition kinetics of IVM, MXD and DRM in cattle, characterized over 80 days post-treatment under standardized experimental conditions, is reported for the first time.

No abstract

No abstract

Triclabendazole (TCBZ) is a halogenated benzimidazole compound that possesses high activity against immature and adult stages of the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica. The intensive use of TCBZ in endemic areas of fascioliasis has resulted in the development of liver flukes resistant to this compound. TCBZ sulphoxide (TCBZSO) and TCBZ sulphone (TCBZSO2) are the main molecules recovered in the bloodstream of TCBZ-treated animals. In order to gain some insight into the possible mechanisms of resistance to TCBZ, the goals of the work described here were: to compare the ex vivo transtegumental diffusion of TCBZ parent drug and its sulpho-metabolites (TCBZSO and TCBZSO2) into TCBZ-susceptible and -resistant liver flukes; and to assess the comparative pattern of TCBZ biotransformation by TCBZ-susceptible and -resistant F. hepatica. For the tegumental diffusion studies, TCBZ-susceptible (Cullompton) and -resistant (Sligo) adult flukes collected from untreated infected sheep were incubated (15-180 min) in KRT buffer containing either TCBZ, TCBZSO or TCBZSO2 (5 nmol.ml-1). For the metabolism studies, microsomal fractions obtained from TCBZ-susceptible and -resistant flukes were incubated for 60 min with TCBZ (40 microM), and the amount of the formed metabolic product (TCBZSO) was measured. Drug/metabolite concentrations were quantified by HPLC. All the assayed TCBZ-related molecules penetrated through the tegument of both TCBZ-susceptible and -resistant flukes. However, significantly lower (approximately 50%) concentrations of TCBZ and TCBZSO were recovered within the TCBZ-resistant flukes compared to the TCBZ-susceptible ones over the 180 min incubation period. The rate of TCBZ sulphoxidative metabolism into TCBZSO was significantly higher (39%) in TCBZ-resistant flukes. The flavin-monooxigenase (FMO) enzyme system appears to be the main metabolic pathway involved in the formation of TCBZSO in both TCBZ-susceptible and -resistant flukes. The altered drug influx/efflux and enhanced metabolic capacity identified in TCBZ-resistant liver flukes may account for the development of resistance to TCBZ.