No abstract

Requirements prioritization is an important issue that determines the way requirements are selected and processed in software projects. There already exist specific methods to classify and prioritize requirements, most of them based on quantitative measures. However, most of existing approaches do not consider collisions, which are an important concern in large-scale requirements sets and, more specifically, in agile development processes where requirements have to be uniquely selected for each software increment. In this paper, we propose QMPSR (Qualitative Method for Prioritizing Software Requirements), an approach that features the prioritization of requirements by considering qualitative elements that are related to the project's priorities. Our approach highlights a prioritization method that has proven to reduce collisions in software requirements rankings. Furthermore, QMPSR improves accuracy in classification when facing large-scale requirements sets, featuring no scalability problems as the number of requirements increases. We formally introduce QMPSR and then define prioritization effort and collision metrics to carry out comprehensive experiments involving different sets of requirements, comparing our approach with well-known existing prioritization methods. The experiments have provided satisfactory results, overcoming existing approaches and ensuring scalability.

En este artículo se propone un método numérico para la calibración de un modelo de equilibrio general dinámico y estocástico (dsge). Esencialmente, este consiste en utilizar un algoritmo híbrido de optimización, primero para encontrar un estado estacionario del modelo y luego para minimizar una función objetivo que se define según el propósito que tenga el investigador con el proceso de calibración. El algoritmo propuesto consiste en una aplicación del algoritmo de simulated annealing, seguido de métodos tradicionales de optimización. Las bondades del algoritmo se analizan mediante simulaciones de Monte * Los resultados y opiniones expresados en este trabajo son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y su contenido no compromete al Banco de la República ni a su Junta Directiva. Los autores agradecen a Lawrence Christiano, Fabio Canova, Douglas Laxton, Juan C. Parra, Sebastian Rassa y a los participantes del Central Bank Workshop (2008) por sus comentarios.

Web development teams comprise non-computer experts working on the conceptual modeling of non-functional aspects in software applications. Later on, such conceptual information is processed by analysts and software engineers to face the technical phases of the software project. However, this information transfer is often difficult to automate since the information processed by the different professionals involves different abstraction levels, as well as important cost and effort that need to be considered. The main aim of this research is to minimize these problems by increasing automation and interoperability in the development of interactive web applications. To take up this challenge, we have created and evaluated a tool that aims at bridging the gap between the conceptual definitions of web contents -i.e., the information architecture, and the UML elements for analysis and design required by software engineers, connecting functional and non-functional information to achieve the rest of technical activities during the software development process.

Esta es la versión de autor de la comunicación de congreso publicada en: This is an author produced version of a paper published in: ABSTRACTFor the most part, Information Architecture processes include sets of activities and techniques to be carried out by the development team to create interactive applications effectively, involving usability concerns at every development step. In fact, plenty of process models have already been proposed to bridge the gap between User-Centered Development and Information Architecture, empowering the development team to build usable applications successfully. However, the combination of UserCentered Development and Information Architecture paradigms sometimes results in cumbersome process models containing lots of phases and activities to be considered, which increases the cycle time to have partial and validated software increments readily. As less effort has been devoted to speed up the usable Information Architecture development, the aim of this paper is to address such problem. To do so, we present Scrum-UIA, an agile and usable development process driven by the Information Architecture. This process is intended to develop web applications by splitting up responsibilities and tasks, and decreasing the time to perform technical activities, in order to readily obtain usable software increments.