Background
Despite its great relevance, there are no studies in our country evaluating
the application of the 2012 guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac
diagnostic catheterization.
Objective
To analyze the adequacy of coronary angiography performed in two hospitals in
the southern region of Brazil.
Methods
This is a multicenter cross-sectional study, which analyzed indications,
results and proposals for the treatment of 737 coronary angiograms performed
in a tertiary hospital with multiple specialties (Hospital A) and a tertiary
cardiology hospital (Hospital B). Elective or emergency coronary
angiographies were included, except for cases of acute myocardial infarction
with ST segment elevation. The level of statistical significance adopted was
5% (p < 0.05).
Results
Of the 737 coronary angiograms, 63.9% were performed in male patients. The
mean age was 61.6 years. The indication was acute coronary syndrome in
57.1%, and investigation of coronary artery disease in 42.9% of the cases.
Regarding appropriation, 80.6% were classified as appropriate, 15.1%
occasionally appropriate, and 4.3% rarely appropriate. The proposed
treatment was clinical for 62.7%, percutaneous coronary intervention for
24.6%, and myocardial revascularization surgery for 12.7% of the cases. Of
the coronary angiographies classified as rarely appropriate, 56.2% were
related to non-performance of previous functional tests, and 21.9% showed
severe coronary lesions. However, regardless of the outcome of coronary
angiography, all patients in this group were indicated for clinical
treatment.
Conclusion
We observed a low number of rarely appropriate coronary angiograms in our
sample. The guideline recommendation in these cases was adequate, and no
patient required revascularization treatment. Most of these cases are due to
non-performance of functional tests.
In December 2019, in the city of Wuhan, capital of Hubei Province, in China, the first cases of a new disease that would reach global proportions and become devastating in many aspects were identified. [1][2][3] The world has watched the spread of this disease caused by the new coronavirus (COVID-19) from Asia to Europe and then to the Americas in less than three months. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) 1 announced the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic.In addition to its rapid transmission, even by presymptomatic and asymptomatic infected individuals, the SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has significantly higher mortality as compared with other coronaviruses associated with
Heart valve diseases account for a significant portion of hospitalizations due to cardiovascular diseases in Brazil. Prosthetic heart valves, which are often part of treatment, are susceptible to complications, such as paravalvular leak. Surgical intervention remains the treatment of choice for correcting this defect. However, transesophageal echocardiography-guided catheter correction has emerged as a less invasive alternative for paravalvular leak treatment in patients at high surgical risk. We report a case of extensive mitral paravalvular leak in a patient who had two previous cardiac surgeries and a high surgical risk, who underwent successful transcatheter closure with three prosthesis implantation by transapical access.
We present a case report in which a conventional intervention for the correction of atrial septal defect resulted in an exploratory videolaparoscopy and exeresis of an ovarian cyst. Atrial septal defect is one of the primary congenital cardiopathies diagnosed in adults; ovarian cysts present a high prevalence and are frequently asymptomatic. The possible relation between atrial septal defect and ovarian cyst is debated. The femoral venous puncture techniques, guided by anatomic landmarks and by ultrasonography, are analyzed from the perspective of current scientific evidence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.