Background
Despite its great relevance, there are no studies in our country evaluating
the application of the 2012 guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac
diagnostic catheterization.
Objective
To analyze the adequacy of coronary angiography performed in two hospitals in
the southern region of Brazil.
Methods
This is a multicenter cross-sectional study, which analyzed indications,
results and proposals for the treatment of 737 coronary angiograms performed
in a tertiary hospital with multiple specialties (Hospital A) and a tertiary
cardiology hospital (Hospital B). Elective or emergency coronary
angiographies were included, except for cases of acute myocardial infarction
with ST segment elevation. The level of statistical significance adopted was
5% (p < 0.05).
Results
Of the 737 coronary angiograms, 63.9% were performed in male patients. The
mean age was 61.6 years. The indication was acute coronary syndrome in
57.1%, and investigation of coronary artery disease in 42.9% of the cases.
Regarding appropriation, 80.6% were classified as appropriate, 15.1%
occasionally appropriate, and 4.3% rarely appropriate. The proposed
treatment was clinical for 62.7%, percutaneous coronary intervention for
24.6%, and myocardial revascularization surgery for 12.7% of the cases. Of
the coronary angiographies classified as rarely appropriate, 56.2% were
related to non-performance of previous functional tests, and 21.9% showed
severe coronary lesions. However, regardless of the outcome of coronary
angiography, all patients in this group were indicated for clinical
treatment.
Conclusion
We observed a low number of rarely appropriate coronary angiograms in our
sample. The guideline recommendation in these cases was adequate, and no
patient required revascularization treatment. Most of these cases are due to
non-performance of functional tests.
BackgroundLeft atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective alternative to oral
anticoagulation (OA) for the prevention of stroke in patients with
non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).ObjectiveTo present the immediate results and late outcomes of patients submitted to
LAAC and included in the Brazilian Registry of Percutaneous Left Atrial
Appendage Closure.Methods91 patients with NVAF, high stroke risk (CHA2DS2VASc
score = 4.5 ± 1.5) and restrictions to OAC (HAS-BLED score = 3.6
± 1.0) underwent 92 LAAC procedures using either the Amplatzer
cardiac plug or the Watchman device in 11 centers in Brazil, between late
2010 and mid 2016.ResultsNinety-six devices were used (1.04 device/procedure, including an additional
non-dedicated device), with a procedural success rate of 97.8%. Associated
procedures were performed in 8.7% of the patients. Complete LAAC was
obtained in 93.3% of the successful cases. In cases of incomplete closure,
no residual leak was larger than 2.5 mm. One patient needed simultaneous
implantation of 2 devices. There were 7 periprocedural major (5 pericardial
effusions requiring pericardiocentesis, 1 non-dedicated device embolization
and 1 coronary air embolism without sequelae) and 4 minor complications.
After 128.6 patient-years of follow-up there were 3 deaths unrelated to the
procedure, 2 major bleedings (one of them in a patient with an unsuccessful
LAAC), thrombus formation over the device in 2 cases (both resolved after
resuming OAC for 3 months) and 2 strokes (2.2%).ConclusionsIn this multicenter, real world registry, that included patients with NVAF
and high thromboembolic and bleeding risks, LAAC effectively prevented
stroke and bleeding when compared to the expected rates based on
CHA2DS2VASc and HASBLED scores for this
population. Complications rate of the procedure was acceptable considering
the beginning of the learning curve of most of the involved operators.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.