Methods: Methods: patients with symptomatic prostatic hyperplasia and candidates for surgical treatment were selected. Both procedures were explained and they had choosen HoLEP or TURP. At the hospital were collected: age, date of birth, international prostate symptom score, urinary peak flow rate, prostate volume, post-voiding residual urine, globular volume and serum PSA. At the procedure operating time, morcellating time (HoLEP), bladder mucosal injury and intercurrences were collected. At the first postoperative day, globular volume and sodium. Besides that were observed the catheter indwelling time and hospital stay and after 90 days, urinary peak flow rate and international prostate symptom score. Statistical analisys have been done partially by Sinpe® and also by a professional team. Results:Results: Results: Results: Results: twenty patients in HoLEP group and 21 at TURP were operated. Baseline urinary peak flow rate was 8 ml/s in both groups and preoperative international prostate symptom score was 22 in HoLEP and 20 in TURP, very similar. Operative time was 85 minutes in HoLEP and 60 in TURP, p<0.05. Hospital stay was 47 hours for HoLEP and 48 hours to TURP, p<0.05. At 90 day the urinary peak flow rate was raised to 21.5 ml/s in HoLEP group and to 20 ml/s in TURP and the median of international prostate symptom score had been reduced to score 3 in both groups. Conclusion: Conclusion: Conclusion: Conclusion: Conclusion: HoLEP is a feasible technique and is as effective as TURP on symptomatic prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatment.

Objective: Establish the efficiency of 6-and 12-punctures transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsies in low risk patients for prostate cancer. Six-punctures (sextant) biopsies were compared to 12-punctures biopsies, assessing which is the best strategy to detect this neoplasm.Materials and Methods: Among 240 patients submitted to prostate biopsy, 54 with suspected small and organ-localized tumors (prostatic specific antigen ≤ 10 ng/mL and digital exam of the prostate not suggesting cancer) in glands < 50 cm 3 were selected, constituting a homogenous sample. These patients were submitted to standard 3-punctures (basal, mid, and apical) sextant biopsy in parasagittal midline of each prostatic lobe, with 3 additional lateral punctures, bilaterally. Each specimen was separately submitted to histological study.Results: Twenty-two (40.7%) patients had prostatic cancer, and 28 presented prostatic hyperplasia, associated or not to inflammatory conditions. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) was detected in 4 patients. From 22 tumors detected by 12-punctures biopsies, 6-punctures biopsies in the parasagittal midline (sextant) diagnosed 50% of the cases, while isolated lateral punctures diagnosed 90.9% of the malignant neoplasms. Basal lateral punctures responded for 72.7% of the cancer diagnosis, while basal sextant punctures responded only for 9.1% of the cases.Conclusion: For low risk prostate cancer, patients' 12-punctures biopsy was more effective, for sextant biopsy failed to diagnose half of the cases of neoplasm. Three lateral punctures (basal, mid, and apical), with 2 additional punctures in the parasagittal midline (mid and apical) bilaterally are suggested as the best biopsy strategy.

No abstract

OBJETIVO: Avaliar os resultados da ureterolitotomia retroperitoneoscópica no tratamento do cálculo ureteral e a necessidade do cateter duplo J para reduzir complicações relacionadas ao procedimento. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo comparativo de 47 pacientes operados pela técnica de ureterolitotomia retroperitoneoscópica, dos quais 31 foram selecionados e divididos em dois grupos: Grupo 1, cujos pacientes não receberam cateter duplo J, e Grupo 2, que foram submetidos ao implante de cateter duplo J transoperatório. Foram coletados dados de urografia excretora pré e pós-operatória, tempo cirúrgico, analgesia pós-operatória, tempo de internação e retirada do dreno. RESULTADOS: Os grupos foram semelhantes quando comparados na idade e sexo, grau de dilatação do trato urinário, posição e tamanho médio do cálculo (Grupo 1= 15,5 ± 6,6mm; Grupo 2= 16,3 ± 6,1mm). O tempo operatório também não teve diferença significativa (Grupo 1= 130 ± 40,3min; Grupo 2= 136,3 ± 49,3min). O Grupo 1 apresentou seis pacientes (37,5 %) com complicações precoces (quatro casos de fístula urinária) e tardias (um caso de estenose de ureter, um caso de exclusão funcional do rim operado), enquanto o Grupo 2 não teve complicações, sendo esta diferença estatisticamente significativa (p=0,011). CONCLUSÃO: O emprego do cateter duplo J foi associado a um número significativamente menor de complicações na ureterolitotomia retroperitoneoscópica. Tempo cirúrgico, analgesia pós-operatória e tempo de internação foram semelhantes entre os grupos com e sem cateter.

No abstract